From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:32:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D436A7.4010604@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D41DAF.6020804@goop.org>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT was removed, so testing for it makes no sense.
> (Not being able to distinguish between non-existent and unset config
> variables is an outstanding Kconfig problem.)
>
IMO we should change it to use #if instead of #ifdef. The transition
problem has been discussed elsewhere.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-19 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-18 7:13 [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3) Jan Beulich
2008-09-18 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-18 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-18 9:31 ` Jan Beulich
2008-09-18 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-18 11:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-18 11:58 ` Jan Beulich
2008-09-18 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-18 18:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-18 18:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-19 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2008-09-19 21:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-19 23:32 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-09-18 15:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
2008-09-18 17:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-18 7:52 ` Yinghai Lu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-05 12:07 [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v2) Jan Beulich
2008-09-05 15:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2008-09-08 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 18:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-09 7:43 ` [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3) Jan Beulich
2008-09-09 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-09 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-09 8:15 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D436A7.4010604@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).