From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: I need some serious help to debug suspend to ram problem
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:22:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D682DB.8020802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D54873.8010108@gmail.com>
Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, 20 of September 2008, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I hit a dead end when trying to understand why my notebook can't
>>> resume from suspend to ram
>>> if this is done two times a row.
>>>
>>> Single suspend/resume cycle works almost perfectly (beep that goes
>>> through the sound card is muted... no morse code for me... :-(
>>>
>>> )
>>>
>>> I compiled a minimal kernel (absolutely nothing but disk drivers, all
>>> experimental option like nohz
>>> turned off)
>>>
>>> But I had to turn SMP, since without it system won't resume first
>>> time I suspend it.
>>> (How could this affect suspend?)
>>
>> It could if the system is 64-bit. In which case please have a look at
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237
>>
>>> With SMP and minimal kernel (of course no closed drivers), I get
>>> same behavior,
>>> first resume works second hangs.
>>>
>>> I then added some debug code to real mode wakeup code, I put there in
>>> first
>>> place instructions, that will save some magic value to rtc (to alarm
>>> registers that I know are preserved during boot cycle), and I
>>> discovered sad thing that first time bios does pass control to
>>> linux, but second time
>>> (when it hangs), it doesn't.
>>>
>>> I tried to update bios, and I got same results.
>>>
>>> Of course it does work with that @#$%^& OS
>>
>> So we're doing something wrong. Please try the appended patch.
> Thanks a lot, but this didn't help.
>
> It still has same pattern, first suspend/resume works perfectly, second
> suspend/resume hangs hard.
> It always happens like this, first resume always work (unless I turn off
> smp in kernel (I test this again), or reserve all low memory)
>
> Also note that if I suspend the system to ram, resume, and then suspend
> to disk, then I can suspend to ram and resume, it seems that
>
> on suspend to ram cycle somehow arms BIOS or something else, so second
> resume in a row doesn't work.
>
> I run 32 bit kernel here, this is a long story (this bios doesn't turn
> fan on when running 64-bit version, I could update it, and I know that
> fan issue is fixed there, but new bios introduces bigger bug, namely it
> makes fan to run almost always regardless of 32/64 type of os.
> And it doesn't fix this suspend/resume issue, I tested this. I could
> start/stop fan manually with a script, but this could fail, and maybe I
> will do so someday.)
>
> The bugzilla seems to be unrelated here, since bios does pass control
> there, but corrupts memory.
> Here I also have seen that bios corrupts memory, but everything resumes
> fine first time, and on second time,
> bios doesn't pass control (I put set of instructions in beginning of
> wakeup real mode assembly file, no page tables, GDT/LDT are used there)
I did same test for kernel without SMP, yes it hangs on first resume, but bios
does pass control to linux, so while this is a minor bug, it is unrelated.
I also tested noapic, pci=nommconf. No luck.
Pattern is always the same, first resume works always, second doesn't.
It is sad since first resume is almost perfect (when I have free time I need to look at sound codec datasheet
and fix few issues there, anyways here alsa has few issues, all this is trivial, I already fixed all issues with desktop
which has a sigmatel codec)
>
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-21 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-20 12:03 I need some serious help to debug suspend to ram problem Maxim Levitsky
2008-09-20 16:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-20 19:01 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-09-21 17:22 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2008-09-21 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-22 7:59 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-09-27 13:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 14:53 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-09-27 16:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 18:12 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-09-21 16:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-10-06 15:11 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D682DB.8020802@gmail.com \
--to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox