From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753139AbYIVObv (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:31:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752491AbYIVObn (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:31:43 -0400 Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:48321 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752268AbYIVObm (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:31:42 -0400 Message-ID: <48D7AC44.6050208@bull.net> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:31:32 +0200 From: Benjamin Thery User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: sysfs: tagged directories not merged completely yet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, Someone made me notice that Eric's "sysfs tagged directories" patchset you merged recently isn't complete in your "patches" tree. The last two patches that actually uses this new feature aren't in your tree yet. * [PATCH 7/8] netns: Enable tagging for net_class directories in sysfs * [PATCH 8/8] sysfs: user namespaces: fix bug with clone(CLONE_NEWUSER) with fairsched I didn't noticed it sooner because I'm still using my own version of the patchset on top of linux-2.6. I'm wondering why you left these two patches out? Is it on purpose? Do you expect other maintainers to merged them in their respective tree? Dave Miller acked the patch for network namespace and said "You can send it all through Greg or whoever, don't feel obligated to push it through me since it depends upon the earlier bits in this series". Thanks. Benjamin -- B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D http://www.bull.com