From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754178AbYIWHnY (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:43:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753166AbYIWHnN (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:43:13 -0400 Received: from mail.bigtelecom.ru ([87.255.0.61]:49169 "EHLO mail.bigtelecom.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753035AbYIWHnM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 03:43:12 -0400 Message-ID: <48D89E0C.9040407@bigtelecom.ru> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:43:08 +0400 From: Badalian Vyacheslav User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080818) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jarek Poplawski CC: Denys Fedoryshchenko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Machine Check Exception Re: NetDev! Please help! References: <48D4F85C.8090709@bigtelecom.ru> <200809202111.01256.denys@visp.net.lb> <48D67239.9040006@gmail.com> <48D7385D.40107@bigtelecom.ru> <20080922065339.GA4399@ff.dom.local> <48D76813.9000603@bigtelecom.ru> <20080922112452.GB5314@ff.dom.local> <48D79709.80400@bigtelecom.ru> <20080922172349.GA2545@ami.dom.local> In-Reply-To: <20080922172349.GA2545@ami.dom.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello I stop eth1 and eth0 and run "emegre portage" and get exception. Now i think its not problem in network part. I miss situation in 2.6.27 about multiqueue and traffic shaper because i was have many work and was can't read all netdev list =( As i understand 2.6.27-rc have support multiqueue, but how it will work with HTB/SFQ? Is tc rules must have in 2.6.27 one root queue (and all queue go to this tree) or need to do many qdiscs and settings it to device queues (i was read some about queue2band)? If it is simple for you - can you sort describe this part of changes? P.S. I think now that problem not in network part of kernel and i think i stop CC netdev and Denys Fedoryshchenko. Thanks for you doing and thanks for help! Thanks. > Actually, it's quite well tested, especially by Denys, and I doubt it > will be much better in 2.6.27. BTW, maybe start eth1, stop eth0 yet? > > Thanks, > Jarek P. > >