* [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal()
@ 2008-09-24 0:19 Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_notify_resume() Hiroshi Shimamoto
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto @ 2008-09-24 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Make do_signal() same.
Thia patch modifies only comments in signal_64.c.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
index bf77d47..5a5fbc3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -410,7 +410,8 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, regs, NULL);
if (signr > 0) {
- /* Re-enable any watchpoints before delivering the
+ /*
+ * Re-enable any watchpoints before delivering the
* signal to user space. The processor register will
* have been cleared if the watchpoint triggered
* inside the kernel.
@@ -418,7 +419,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (current->thread.debugreg7)
set_debugreg(current->thread.debugreg7, 7);
- /* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
+ /* Whee! Actually deliver the signal. */
if (handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs) == 0) {
/*
* A signal was successfully delivered; the saved
@@ -441,6 +442,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
regs->ax = regs->orig_ax;
regs->ip -= 2;
break;
+
case -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK:
regs->ax = NR_restart_syscall;
regs->ip -= 2;
--
1.5.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_notify_resume()
2008-09-24 0:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal() Hiroshi Shimamoto
@ 2008-09-24 0:21 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 0:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of handle_signal() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 7:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal() Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto @ 2008-09-24 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Make do_notify_resume() same.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c | 8 ++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
index da3cf32..b94463f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
@@ -663,6 +663,12 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
void
do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused, __u32 thread_info_flags)
{
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_X86_MCE)
+ /* notify userspace of pending MCEs */
+ if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_MCE_NOTIFY)
+ mce_notify_user();
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 && CONFIG_X86_MCE */
+
/* deal with pending signal delivery */
if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
do_signal(regs);
@@ -672,7 +678,9 @@ do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused, __u32 thread_info_flags)
tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
clear_thread_flag(TIF_IRET);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
}
void signal_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, void __user *frame, char *where)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
index 5a5fbc3..9087752 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -460,14 +460,18 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
}
-void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused,
- __u32 thread_info_flags)
+/*
+ * notification of userspace execution resumption
+ * - triggered by the TIF_WORK_MASK flags
+ */
+void
+do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused, __u32 thread_info_flags)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && defined(CONFIG_X86_MCE)
/* notify userspace of pending MCEs */
if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_MCE_NOTIFY)
mce_notify_user();
-#endif /* CONFIG_X86_MCE */
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 && CONFIG_X86_MCE */
/* deal with pending signal delivery */
if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
@@ -477,6 +481,10 @@ void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, void *unused,
clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_IRET);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
}
void signal_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, void __user *frame, char *where)
--
1.5.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of handle_signal()
2008-09-24 0:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_notify_resume() Hiroshi Shimamoto
@ 2008-09-24 0:22 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 7:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal() Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto @ 2008-09-24 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
Make handle_signal() same.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c | 9 +++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
index b94463f..bb05917 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_32.c
@@ -550,6 +550,15 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
if (ret)
return ret;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ /*
+ * This has nothing to do with segment registers,
+ * despite the name. This magic affects uaccess.h
+ * macros' behavior. Reset it to the normal setting.
+ */
+ set_fs(USER_DS);
+#endif
+
/*
* Clear the direction flag as per the ABI for function entry.
*/
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
index 9087752..963236f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -346,12 +346,14 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
if (ret)
return ret;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/*
* This has nothing to do with segment registers,
* despite the name. This magic affects uaccess.h
* macros' behavior. Reset it to the normal setting.
*/
set_fs(USER_DS);
+#endif
/*
* Clear the direction flag as per the ABI for function entry.
--
1.5.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal()
2008-09-24 0:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_notify_resume() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 0:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of handle_signal() Hiroshi Shimamoto
@ 2008-09-24 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-09-24 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
* Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
>
> Make do_signal() same.
> Thia patch modifies only comments in signal_64.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
applied your patches to tip/x86/signal:
86d3237: x86: signal: cosmetic unification of handle_signal()
ee847c5: x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_notify_resume()
5fd9333: x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal()
thanks!
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-24 7:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-24 0:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 0:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_notify_resume() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 0:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of handle_signal() Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-09-24 7:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: signal: cosmetic unification of do_signal() Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox