From: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>
Subject: [Patch -tip 1/3] Tracing/ftrace: Relay unhandled entry output
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:19:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DB81BA.2050204@gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 798 bytes --]
Hi!
I tried to figure out the origin of the bug reported by Pekka Paalanen
about the broken pipe:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/15/3305224
When I add a trace_mark with the boot tracer, I had this same problem
but this time it was easy to reproduce.
When it calls a tracer's print_line callback, the print_trace_line function
in trace.c returns whithout verifying if it could handle the entry properly.
And actually the seq could be empty.
For example the boot_tracer don't handle TRACE_PRINT. Nevertheless it
wants them to be printed as a default way.
So print_trace_line function should relay on the other functions which could handle
an output if one of them fail.
Reported-by: Pekka Paalanen <pq@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
[-- Attachment #2: 1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1016 bytes --]
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 6ada059..50ac334 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1904,20 +1904,27 @@ static int trace_empty(struct trace_iterator *iter)
static int print_trace_line(struct trace_iterator *iter)
{
+ int ret;
+
if (iter->trace && iter->trace->print_line)
- return iter->trace->print_line(iter);
+ if ((ret = iter->trace->print_line(iter)))
+ return ret;
if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_BIN)
- return print_bin_fmt(iter);
+ if ((ret = print_bin_fmt(iter)))
+ return ret;
if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_HEX)
- return print_hex_fmt(iter);
+ if ((ret = print_hex_fmt(iter)))
+ return ret;
if (trace_flags & TRACE_ITER_RAW)
- return print_raw_fmt(iter);
+ if ((ret = print_raw_fmt(iter)))
+ return ret;
if (iter->iter_flags & TRACE_FILE_LAT_FMT)
- return print_lat_fmt(iter, iter->idx, iter->cpu);
+ if ((ret = print_lat_fmt(iter, iter->idx, iter->cpu)))
+ return ret;
return print_trace_fmt(iter);
}
next reply other threads:[~2008-09-25 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-25 12:19 Frédéric Weisbecker [this message]
2008-09-25 12:38 ` [Patch -tip 1/3] Tracing/ftrace: Relay unhandled entry output Ingo Molnar
2008-09-25 14:56 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-09-25 15:09 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-09-25 15:33 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-09-25 15:49 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-09-25 15:56 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-09-25 16:01 ` Pekka Paalanen
2008-09-25 16:40 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-09-27 17:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-29 9:29 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-09-27 17:53 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48DB81BA.2050204@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pq@iki.fi \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox