From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754556AbYIZB7q (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:59:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753114AbYIZB7i (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:59:38 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41243 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753075AbYIZB7h (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:59:37 -0400 Message-ID: <48DC41D2.4090806@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:58:42 -0400 From: Chris Snook Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brandeburg, Jesse" CC: LKML , Jiri Kosina , agospoda@redhat.com, "Ronciak, John" , "Allan, Bruce W" , "Graham, David" , kkiel@suse.de, tglx@linutronix.de, chris.jones@canonical.com, arjan@linux.jf.intel.com Subject: Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status References: <987CEB09A2567F4A963E1E226364E2D33A685B4B@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > hardware affected: > laptops and desktops with 82566 or 82567 based LAN parts, which are > machines with the ICH8 and ICH9 chipsets and a variety of processors. > The machines I know of that have reported the issue include > Lenovo X300 > HP 2510p > Intel DP35JO > Lenovo T61 (possibly) > Lenovo X61 (possibly) My Intel DG45ID board has an ICH10R chipset, and it also has an 82567LM, just as some of the affected systems. Is there some reason why ICH10 is not susceptible, or have we simply not seen it? -- Chris