From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753519AbYI2RT4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:19:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751102AbYI2RTs (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:19:48 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:49754 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750819AbYI2RTs (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:19:48 -0400 Message-ID: <48E10E4F.3000201@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:20:15 -0400 From: Chris Snook User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Czerak CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mounted file system bottleneck References: <325d52860809290641haddf616xfe9c98912352ba22@mail.gmail.com> <325d52860809290645p7526b318h7ff9b7e76570f65f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <325d52860809290645p7526b318h7ff9b7e76570f65f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jason Czerak wrote: > I believe I found some sort of bottleneck with mounted networked file > systems over 10Gig Ethernet. I've posted a question to linux-net with > zero response since Friday. You're posting a support question to a developer list. This is frowned upon. You might get more attention here if you conduct a more scientific test and report it in a more scientific fashion. > http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/net/0809.3/0013.html This is also frowned upon. Please send your data directly to the list, unless it is absolutely enormous. > Could a few of you folks here take a look at this and tell me what you > think is the issue? Offhand, I'd guess atime updates. Unless you're seeing this on a new upstream kernel, you should contact your vendor for support. Or NetApp. -- Chris