From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753750AbYI3C3M (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:29:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751838AbYI3C3A (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:29:00 -0400 Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]:63472 "EHLO idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751337AbYI3C3A (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:29:00 -0400 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=HOhdE9u-WYN0aroMwiMA:9 a=SVMuZF8tBLfnCP-00mbXXuCTqt8A:4 a=KDuXG24fJ1wA:10 a=7n8Uyyn8sX4A:10 Message-ID: <48E18EEC.2060306@shaw.ca> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:29:00 -0600 From: Robert Hancock User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gettinther CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sata dvdroms fails to be recognized by MCP55 controller with the 2.6.26.5 kernel References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org gettinther wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to get the 2.6.26.5 kernel to work but cannot get > the sata dvdrom to be recognized by the MCP55. The controller works > with the 2.6.24.4 and 2.6.25.17 kernels. I had to use > CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK=y for the 2.6.25.17 but this did not work with the > 2.6.26.5. The problem has been confirmed on at least 2 machines. > > I have tried various boot options (pci=nomsi, acpi=off and any other > relevant code I could find) but nothing seems to work. The odd thing > is the sata dvdrom was recognized twice by the 2.6.26.5 kernel (2 > different kernel tests) for no apparent reason (could not get it to > work afterward). > > Here's the cut info for each kernel from /var/log/messages (2.6.25.17, > 2.6.26.5 working, 2.6.26.5 not working). If you require further > information I can submit it. I don't want to put too much on the first > message. Can you test 2.6.27-rc8?