From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@poczta.fm>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: do not allow to optimize flag_is_changeable_p()
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:54:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E1CD29.8050109@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440809292334o557d2158ob2c52aebd3caf0b3@mail.gmail.com>
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
>> Krzysztof Helt wrote:
>>
>>> From: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
>>>
>>> The flag_is_changeable_p() is used by
>>> has_cpuid_p() which can return different results
>>> in the code sequence below:
>>>
>>> if (!have_cpuid_p())
>>> identify_cpu_without_cpuid(c);
>>>
>>> /* cyrix could have cpuid enabled via c_identify()*/
>>> if (!have_cpuid_p())
>>> return;
>>>
>>> Otherwise, the gcc 3.4.6 optimizes these two calls
>>> into one which make the code not working correctly.
>>> Cyrix cpus have the CPUID instruction enabled but
>>> it is not detected due to the gcc optimization.
>>> Thus the ARR registers (mtrr like) are not detected
>>> on such a cpu.
>>>
>>>
>> If "asm volatile" changes the code and fixes the bug, it seems like
>> you're making use of an undocumented - or at least non-portable - behaviour.
>>
>> Does adding a "memory" clobber also fix the problem? That would have
>> better defined characteristics.
>>
>>
>
> how about
>
> if (!have_cpuid_p()) {
> identify_cpu_without_cpuid(c);
>
> /* cyrix could have cpuid enabled via c_identify()*/
> if (!have_cpuid_p())
> return;
> }
>
That doesn't help, does it? If gcc thinks it can get away with
evaluating have_cpuid_p() once, then that's the same as:
if (!have_cpuid_p()) {
identify_cpu_without_cpuid(c);
return;
}
even though identify_cpu_without_cpuid() can cause the cpu to suddenly
start supporting cpuid.
The trouble is that flag_is_changeable_p() doesn't have any obvious
global dependencies; it just takes a constant argument and returns a
result. The asm() needs to be updated to have a "memory" constraint as
a stand-in for the specific constraint of "cpu has switched into
cpuid-supporting state".
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-29 18:06 [PATCH] x86: do not allow to optimize flag_is_changeable_p() Krzysztof Helt
2008-09-29 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-30 6:14 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-30 6:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-30 6:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-30 8:27 krzysztof.h1
2008-09-30 15:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E1CD29.8050109@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=krzysztof.h1@poczta.fm \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox