From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reserve FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR in used_vectors bitmap.
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:53:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E22165.7040907@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080930095149.GA7557@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Someone from the community found out, that after repeatedly unloading
>> and loading a device driver that uses MSI IRQs, the system eventually
>> assigned the vector initially reserved for IRQ0 to the device driver.
>
>> The reason for this is, that although IRQ0 is tied to the
>> FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR when declaring the irq_vector table, the
>> corresponding bit in the used_vectors map is not set. So, if vectors
>> are released and assigned often enough, the vector will get assigned
>> to another interrupt. This happens more often with MSI interrupts as
>> those are exclusively using a vector.
>>
>> Fix this by setting the bit for the FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR in the bitmap.
>
> hi, the IO-APIC code got unified in the x86 tree for v2.6.28.
>
> So could you please send the fix against tip/master:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
I can't see this as required for tip. FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR is there defined
distinct to the ISA IRQs (IRQ15_VECTOR+2) while it is defined to be equal to
IRQ0_VECTOR on 2.6.27 and before (at least down to 2.6.24).
Regards,
Stefan
--
When all other means of communication fail, try words!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-29 13:39 [PATCH] x86: Reserve FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR in used_vectors bitmap Stefan Bader
2008-09-30 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 12:53 ` Stefan Bader [this message]
2008-10-02 12:14 ` Stefan Bader
2008-10-03 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-10 20:01 Stefan Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E22165.7040907@canonical.com \
--to=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox