From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [bug report] sched: stop_machine() usage causes load balancer to misbehave
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:57:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E55FE5.40108@nortel.com> (raw)
I mentioned before that ftrace (specifically the ftraced daemon) seems
to be interfering with the load balancer. After some experimenting, it
appears that any regular calls to stop_machine() will end up confusing
the load balancer.
As an experiment, I disabled ftraced (which would normally result in
correct load balancing) but added a single kernel thread which simply
runs the following loop, where "chrisd2" is a dummy function.
while(1) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(HZ);
stop_machine(chrisd2, NULL, NULL);
}
With the modified kernel, my testcase shows that the load balancer
doesn't balance--all tasks remain on one cpu while the other one stays idle.
Most of the users of stop_machine() (kprobes on s390, cpu hotplug,
module load/unload, numa_zonelist_order, etc.) don't seem to be called
on a regular basis. Only ftrace behaves this way, which is why it
appeared to be the source of the problem.
I haven't tracked down the specific reasons for the misbehaviour, but it
seems undesirable.
Anyone have any ideas what might be causing this? Is it a problem with
the load balancer, or an unavoidable consequence of what stop_machine()
is doing?
Thanks,
Chris
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-02 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-02 23:57 Chris Friesen [this message]
2008-10-03 0:02 ` [bug report] sched: stop_machine() usage causes load balancer to misbehave Steven Rostedt
2008-10-04 5:27 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E55FE5.40108@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox