From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755196AbYJGOJA (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:09:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753622AbYJGOIu (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:08:50 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46433 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753582AbYJGOIu (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:08:50 -0400 Message-ID: <48EB6D2C.30806@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:07:40 -0500 From: Christoph Lameter User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Matt Mackall , linux-mm , Nick Piggin , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [BUG] SLOB's krealloc() seems bust References: <1223387841.26330.36.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <1223387841.26330.36.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Which basically shows us that the content of the pcpu_size[] array got > corrupted after the krealloc() call in split_block(). > > Which made me look at which slab allocator I had selected, which turned > out to be SLOB (from testing the network swap stuff). krealloc() is in generic core code (mm/util.c) and is the same for all allocators. krealloc uses ksize() which is somewhat dicey for SLOB because it only works on kmalloc'ed memory. Is the krealloc used on memory allocated with kmalloc()? Slob's ksize could use a BUG_ON for the case in which ksize() is used on kmem_cache_alloc'd memory. /* can't use ksize for kmem_cache_alloc memory, only kmalloc */ size_t ksize(const void *block) { struct slob_page *sp; BUG_ON(!block); if (unlikely(block == ZERO_SIZE_PTR)) return 0; sp = (struct slob_page *)virt_to_page(block); Add a BUG_ON(!kmalloc_cache(sp))? if (slob_page(sp)) return ((slob_t *)block - 1)->units + SLOB_UNIT; ^^^^^^^ Is this correct? else return sp->page.private; }