public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Hansen <x@jeffhansen.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: x86_32 tsc/pit and hrtimers
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:25:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48ED1728.5060708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810081342570.11108@ren>

Jeff Hansen wrote:
> This worked perfectly!  I second adding a kernel option that forces 
> trusting the TSC.  I can make a patch if you'd like.  Should the option 
> be something like "trusttsc" or "tsc=noverify"?

How about a "highres=noverify" flag, to disable all CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY 
checking? People might want to use this with other timers too.

-- Chris

> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Chris Snook wrote:
> 
>> Jeff Hansen wrote:
>>>  Linus, Ingo, All,
>>>
>>>  I've been struggling with hrtimer support in 2.6.26.5 on an older
>>>  x86_32/i386 system, and I'm wondering if there are any easy fixes 
>>> that you
>>>  (or anyone else) would suggest.
>>>
>>>  Basically, this system does not print out the message:
>>>
>>>  "Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0"
>>>
>>>  indicating that one-shot, hrtimers, etc. won't work, since high 
>>> resolution
>>>  mode has not been enabled.  I've verified that hrtimers started with
>>>  hrtimer_start do not have the expected resolution further than 1/HZ.
>>>
>>>  This system does not have LAPIC, ACPI, or HPET, so really the only
>>>  clocksources I can use are TSC and PIT.  This should be fine (in 
>>> theory,
>>>  unless it wasn't designed like that), but apparently the clocksource 
>>> flags
>>>  are not initialized in such a way that one of them ever gets marked as
>>>  CLOCK_SOURCE_VALID_FOR_HRES.
>>>
>>>  The flow of the flags on each of these clocksources is as follows:
>>>
>>>  1) The flags on the TSC clocksource are CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS |
>>>      CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY, which causes PIT to be used as the 
>>> watchdog
>>>      clocksource. (see kernel/time/clocksource.c:~171)
>>>  2) Around line 122 in kernel/time/clocksource.c, where most 
>>> clocksources'
>>>      flags usually get ORed with CLOCK_SOURCE_VALID_FOR_HRES, the 
>>> PIT's do
>>>      not because it is not CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS, and the TSC's 
>>> do not
>>>      also because the PIT (as the watchdog) is not
>>>      CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS.
>>>
>>>  I get the same results on a new laptop booting into 32-bit Linux 
>>> with hpet
>>>  and acpi disabled.
>>>
>>>  Can you please tell me if this is supposed to work, and I just have a
>>>  poorly configured kernel; or if TSC/PIT drivers were not designed to 
>>> work
>>>  this way in the first place.  If it wasn't designed to do this, do you
>>>  have any tips on implementing this, since I'll be needing to do that?
>>>
>>>  -Jeff Hansen
>>
>> This is not supposed to work, but it might be worthwhile to add a boot 
>> option to force the kernel to trust the TSC, as hardware that lacks 
>> any high-res timers also tends to be primitive enough that the TSC can 
>> be trusted, if it exists.  If you patch out the 
>> CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY flag on the TSC, do you get 
>> correctly-functioning high-res timers on this system?
>>
>> -- Chris
>>
>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-08 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-07 22:41 x86_32 tsc/pit and hrtimers Jeff Hansen
2008-10-08 18:41 ` Chris Snook
2008-10-08 19:46   ` Jeff Hansen
2008-10-08 20:25     ` Chris Snook [this message]
2008-10-08 21:43       ` [PATCH] " Jeff Hansen
2008-10-08 21:47         ` Randy.Dunlap
2008-10-08 21:47         ` Chris Snook
2008-10-08 21:56           ` Jeff Hansen
2008-10-09  7:14             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 18:39               ` Chris Snook
2008-10-09 19:18                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 19:45                   ` Jeff Hansen
2008-10-09 19:53                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 20:45                       ` Alok kataria
2008-10-09 21:03                         ` Chris Snook
2008-10-09 21:18                           ` Jeff Hansen
2008-10-09 22:03                             ` Alok Kataria
2008-10-09 21:53                           ` Alok Kataria
2008-10-09 22:50                             ` Chris Snook
2008-10-09 23:22                               ` Alok Kataria
2008-10-09 23:37                                 ` Chris Snook
2008-10-10 14:24                                   ` Jeff Hansen
2008-10-09 17:20   ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48ED1728.5060708@redhat.com \
    --to=csnook@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x@jeffhansen.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox