From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Markers : fix check format with rcu callback race
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:18:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EEF3A6.3050205@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081010054444.GB19481@Krystal>
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> The fix "markers: fix unchecked format" introduced an RCU callback race. This
> patch takes care of calling any pending RCU callback before set_format is
> called.
>
marker_set_format() has this statement:
if ((*entry)->rcu_pending)
rcu_barrier_sched();
>
> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>> bit-field is not thread-safe nor smp-safe.
>>
>> struct marker_entry.rcu_pending is not protected by any lock
>> in rcu-callback free_old_closure().
>> so we must turn it into a safe type.
>>
>
> All struct marker_entry.rcu_pending accesses are done with the
> markers_mutex held, except the one done in free_old_closure(). Normally,
> there should be a
> if (entry->rcu_pending)
> rcu_barrier_sched();
>
> At the beginning of each markers_mutex section (just after get_marker())
> to make sure any pending callback is executed at that point before any
> of rcu_pending or ptype are touched.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/marker.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/marker.c 2008-10-10 01:35:32.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c 2008-10-10 01:35:32.000000000 -0400
> @@ -657,21 +657,23 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *na
> entry = add_marker(name, format);
> if (IS_ERR(entry))
> ret = PTR_ERR(entry);
> - } else if (format) {
> - if (!entry->format)
> - ret = marker_set_format(&entry, format);
> - else if (strcmp(entry->format, format))
> - ret = -EPERM;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * If we detect that a call_rcu is pending for this marker,
> + * make sure it's executed now.
> + */
> + if (entry->rcu_pending)
> + rcu_barrier_sched();
> + if (format) {
> + if (!entry->format)
> + ret = marker_set_format(&entry, format);
> + else if (strcmp(entry->format, format))
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + }
> }
> if (ret)
> goto end;
>
> - /*
> - * If we detect that a call_rcu is pending for this marker,
> - * make sure it's executed now.
> - */
> - if (entry->rcu_pending)
> - rcu_barrier_sched();
> old = marker_entry_add_probe(entry, probe, probe_private);
> if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(old);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-10 5:44 [PATCH] Markers : fix check format with rcu callback race Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-10 6:18 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2008-10-10 7:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EEF3A6.3050205@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox