public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se>
To: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ATNGW100 serial ports configurable
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:48:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EF7949.4010108@control.lth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081010165814.1c62eabf@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>

Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se> wrote:
>> Make configuration of ATNGW100 serial ports selectable in kernel configuration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se>
> 
> Gak. If we're going down this path, why not add #ifdefs for every other
> conceivable hardware mod as well and turn the ATNGW100 board code into
> an even worse mess than the ATSTK1000 board code?
OK, good point. The reason I sent in the patch is that people on AVRFreaks had
asked how to do it, and putting it in the configuration would (theoretically)
make it possible to catch pin conflicts.


> The ATNGW100 has one serial port on board, so IMO the standard board
> code should only initialize that one port.
Which was my intention, unless SERIAL_ATMEL_USARTn was selected.

> However, it might be sensible to add some sort of interface for
> expansion board code. For example something like this:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_ATNGW100_EXPANSION
> 	atngw100_setup_expansion_board();
> #endif
Since that file has to reside inside the kernel tree (?), one could almost as
easily replace the entire setup.c.

Shouldn't this be something like:

void __init setup_board(void)
{
...
#ifdef CONFIG_ATNGW100_EXPANSION
 	atngw100_setup_expansion_board();
#endif
}

static int __init atngw100_init(void)
{
...
#ifdef CONFIG_ATNGW100_EXPANSION
 	atngw100_init_expansion_board();
#endif
}

> This will allow people with hardware mods to add all the extra devices
> they need, including serial ports, by simply adding another file with
> expansion board code. People who aren't afraid to solder stuff on their
> boards shouldn't be afraid of writing some board code too, right?
> 
> What do you think?
An even nicer way of handling it (provided that initialization does not need to
take place during boot), might be to do EXPORT_SYMBOL() on
at32_add_device_usart, at32_map_usart, etc and then write a loadable module that
handles the initialization.

Regards

Anders Blomdell


-- 
Anders Blomdell                  Email: anders.blomdell@control.lth.se
Department of Automatic Control
Lund University                  Phone:    +46 46 222 4625
P.O. Box 118                     Fax:      +46 46 138118
SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-10 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-10 14:32 [PATCH] Make ATNGW100 serial ports configurable Anders Blomdell
2008-10-10 14:58 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-10 15:48   ` Anders Blomdell [this message]
2008-10-13 10:27     ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-13 10:53       ` Anders Blomdell
2008-10-13 12:34         ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-13 13:03           ` Anders Blomdell
2008-10-13 13:33             ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-13 14:46               ` Anders Blomdell
2008-10-13 15:28                 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
     [not found]                   ` <48F37707.8040401@control.lth.se>
     [not found]                     ` <20081013191534.7cbeebc1@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>
2008-10-13 18:08                       ` Anders Blomdell
2008-10-13 21:23                         ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2008-10-14  7:23                           ` Anders Blomdell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48EF7949.4010108@control.lth.se \
    --to=anders.blomdell@control.lth.se \
    --cc=haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox