From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@fr.ibm.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:18:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EF8E77.8050000@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223656489.10017.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Greg Kurz wrote:
> This flag is weak... testing it gives absolutly no hint whether the
> checkpoint may succeed or not. As it is designed now, a user can only be
> aware that checkpoint is *forever* denied. I agree that it's only useful
> as a "flexible CR todo list".
I don't think it's true that it gives "absolutly no hint".
If the flag is not set, then checkpoint will succeed, right? Whereas if
the flag is set, then it's an indication that checkpoint could fail (but
may still succeed if whatever condition caused the flag to be set is no
longer true).
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-10 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-09 19:04 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Dave Hansen
2008-10-09 19:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] first callers of process_deny_checkpoint() Dave Hansen
2008-10-09 19:43 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-09 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2008-10-10 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 13:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-10 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 19:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-10 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 20:40 ` Len Brown
2008-10-10 22:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-11 13:48 ` Pavel Machek
2008-10-11 15:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 10:27 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-10-10 8:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-10 10:17 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-10-10 14:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-10 16:45 ` Greg Kurz
2008-10-10 17:13 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-10 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2008-10-13 8:20 ` Greg Kurz
2008-10-10 8:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Greg Kurz
2008-10-10 8:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-10 8:47 ` Greg Kurz
2008-10-10 10:11 ` Oren Laadan
2008-10-10 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 15:17 ` Oren Laadan
2008-10-10 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-10 16:34 ` Greg Kurz
2008-10-10 16:36 ` Dave Hansen
2008-10-10 20:57 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-10 17:18 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2008-10-13 8:18 ` Greg Kurz
2008-10-13 16:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-10 16:33 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EF8E77.8050000@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=gkurz@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox