From: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Breaks the redundant loop in kernel/marker.c
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:17:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FC3083.8020104@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081020065205.GA12927@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm, could you describe the necessity of this patch some more? This has
> the change to change behavior, which might even be a bugfix: is there
> any chance that the closure-loop in the e->ptype != NULL branch does not
> exit? Before your patch we'd continue the iteration - which _probably_
> does not lead to any more matches (e->name is supposed to be unique).
Because e->name is unique in list, we don't need to continue the iteration
after matched.
This is a cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/marker.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/marker.c b/kernel/marker.c
index 7d1faec..2c3172d 100644
--- a/kernel/marker.c
+++ b/kernel/marker.c
@@ -836,8 +836,6 @@ void *marker_get_private_data(const char *name, marker_probe_func *probe,
if (!e->ptype) {
if (num == 0 && e->single.func == probe)
return e->single.probe_private;
- else
- break;
} else {
struct marker_probe_closure *closure;
int match = 0;
@@ -849,6 +847,7 @@ void *marker_get_private_data(const char *name, marker_probe_func *probe,
return closure[i].probe_private;
}
}
+ break;
}
}
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
--
1.5.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-20 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-20 6:37 [PATCH] Breaks the redundant loop in kernel/marker.c Zhaolei
2008-10-20 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-20 7:17 ` Zhaolei [this message]
2008-10-20 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-20 15:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-22 3:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Zhaolei
2008-10-22 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48FC3083.8020104@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox