public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@suse.de>
To: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@superonline.com>
Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@novell.com>,
	Olaf Dabrunz <odabrunz@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FC38AE.3030007@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48FB6321.7030501@superonline.com>

M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 10:06 -0400, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> As you might guess from the subject line, since I started to use 2.6.27-rcX
>>> series, I began to get "irq 18: nobody cared" messages in dmesg. Currently I am
>>> using 2.6.27.2 with Sidux on this laptop, which is a Toshiba Satellite A100.
>>> I have reproduced this problem with vanilla and sidux's kernels.
>>>
>> Can you provide the contents of /proc/interrupts? 

Could you provide the following:
- output of lspci -nn
- dmesg output with kernel commandline option apic=debug

> My computer is currently in the "nobody cared" state. Here are the current
> contents of /proc/interrupts:
> 
> --- 8< ---
>            CPU0       CPU1       
>   0:   45249492      60399   IO-APIC-edge      timer
>   1:      25451          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>   8:          1          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc0
>   9:      36514          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
>  12:    1147983       2103   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>  14:     170245          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
>  15:     558085        819   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
>  16:        508          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb5, i915@pci:0000:00:02.0
>  17:       1353          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   firewire_ohci
>  18:     300158          1   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb4, tifm_7xx1, yenta
>  19:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb3
>  20:      26606          2   IO-APIC-fasteoi   eth0
>  22:    3206279          1   IO-APIC-fasteoi   HDA Intel
>  23:          3          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb1, ehci_hcd:usb2
> 220:    2105545          0   PCI-MSI-edge      iwl3945
> NMI:          0          0   Non-maskable interrupts
> LOC:    5971997   27874747   Local timer interrupts
> RES:     938710    1791498   Rescheduling interrupts
> CAL:     138135     180813   function call interrupts
> TLB:      48455      64413   TLB shootdowns
> TRM:          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
> SPU:          0          0   Spurious interrupts
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> --- >8 ---

Nothing unusual at first glance. How long did the system run?

> 
>> If you can reproduce the keyboard issue, it would be helpful to have the
>> above a few seconds before and after the device failure.
> 
> The keyboard issue happens every time I get the "nobody cared" message.
> 
> Unfortunately, this regression requires me to wait a long time before it shows itself.
> As I mentioned in my original e-mail, the "nobody cared" message appears at 3:00
> or 5:00 in the morning. However, I can write a cron job which saves the contents
> of /proc/interrupts every minute or so. If this would be helpful, please let me know.
> 
>>> Note 2: Another interesting thing which might be relevant is the following
>>> message which appears in dmesg some time after I boot:
>>>
>>> --- 8< ---
>>> hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
>>> --- >8 ---
>>>
>> Is this card using IRQ 18?
> 
> It seems to use IRQ 22. I thought that there might be a connection, but it looks
> like it isn't relevant.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sven
> 
> Thank you; I appreciate your help.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> M. Vefa Bicakci
> 

  Stefan

-- 
Stefan Assmann          | SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Software Engineer       | Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
Mail : sassmann@suse.de | GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-20  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-19 14:06 Regression in 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100 M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-10-19 15:55 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-10-19 16:41   ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-10-20  7:52     ` Stefan Assmann [this message]
2008-10-20 22:08       ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-10-21 15:56         ` Stefan Assmann
2008-11-02 20:48           ` Update: "nobody " M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-11-03 15:34             ` Stefan Assmann
2008-11-09  5:32               ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-11-12  7:59                 ` Len Brown
2008-11-12  7:52             ` Len Brown
2008-10-20  0:27 ` Regression in 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody " Michal Jaegermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48FC38AE.3030007@suse.de \
    --to=sassmann@suse.de \
    --cc=bicave@superonline.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=odabrunz@suse.de \
    --cc=sdietrich@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox