* [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
@ 2008-10-15 6:56 Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-15 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2008-10-15 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers, Linux Kernel Mailing List
current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it,
and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/marker.c b/kernel/marker.c
index e49a9c5..ef43c86 100644
--- a/kernel/marker.c
+++ b/kernel/marker.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct marker_entry {
void *oldptr;
int rcu_pending;
unsigned char ptype:1;
+ unsigned char format_allocated:1;
char name[0]; /* Contains name'\0'format'\0' */
};
@@ -415,6 +416,7 @@ static struct marker_entry *add_marker(const char *name, const char *format)
e->single.probe_private = NULL;
e->multi = NULL;
e->ptype = 0;
+ e->format_allocated = 0;
e->refcount = 0;
e->rcu_pending = 0;
hlist_add_head(&e->hlist, head);
@@ -446,6 +448,8 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
if (e->single.func != __mark_empty_function)
return -EBUSY;
hlist_del(&e->hlist);
+ if (e->format_allocated)
+ kfree(e->format);
/* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
if (e->rcu_pending)
rcu_barrier_sched();
@@ -456,57 +460,34 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
/*
* Set the mark_entry format to the format found in the element.
*/
-static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry **entry, const char *format)
+static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry *entry, const char *format)
{
- struct marker_entry *e;
- size_t name_len = strlen((*entry)->name) + 1;
- size_t format_len = strlen(format) + 1;
-
-
- e = kmalloc(sizeof(struct marker_entry) + name_len + format_len,
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!e)
+ entry->format = kstrdup(format, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!entry->format)
return -ENOMEM;
- memcpy(&e->name[0], (*entry)->name, name_len);
- e->format = &e->name[name_len];
- memcpy(e->format, format, format_len);
- if (strcmp(e->format, MARK_NOARGS) == 0)
- e->call = marker_probe_cb_noarg;
- else
- e->call = marker_probe_cb;
- e->single = (*entry)->single;
- e->multi = (*entry)->multi;
- e->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
- e->refcount = (*entry)->refcount;
- e->rcu_pending = 0;
- hlist_add_before(&e->hlist, &(*entry)->hlist);
- hlist_del(&(*entry)->hlist);
- /* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
- if ((*entry)->rcu_pending)
- rcu_barrier_sched();
- kfree(*entry);
- *entry = e;
+ entry->format_allocated = 1;
+
trace_mark(core_marker_format, "name %s format %s",
- e->name, e->format);
+ entry->name, entry->format);
return 0;
}
/*
* Sets the probe callback corresponding to one marker.
*/
-static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
+static int set_marker(struct marker_entry *entry, struct marker *elem,
int active)
{
int ret;
- WARN_ON(strcmp((*entry)->name, elem->name) != 0);
+ WARN_ON(strcmp(entry->name, elem->name) != 0);
- if ((*entry)->format) {
- if (strcmp((*entry)->format, elem->format) != 0) {
+ if (entry->format) {
+ if (strcmp(entry->format, elem->format) != 0) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE
"Format mismatch for probe %s "
"(%s), marker (%s)\n",
- (*entry)->name,
- (*entry)->format,
+ entry->name,
+ entry->format,
elem->format);
return -EPERM;
}
@@ -522,34 +503,33 @@ static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
* pass from a "safe" callback (with argument) to an "unsafe"
* callback (does not set arguments).
*/
- elem->call = (*entry)->call;
+ elem->call = entry->call;
/*
* Sanity check :
* We only update the single probe private data when the ptr is
* set to a _non_ single probe! (0 -> 1 and N -> 1, N != 1)
*/
WARN_ON(elem->single.func != __mark_empty_function
- && elem->single.probe_private
- != (*entry)->single.probe_private &&
- !elem->ptype);
- elem->single.probe_private = (*entry)->single.probe_private;
+ && elem->single.probe_private != entry->single.probe_private
+ && !elem->ptype);
+ elem->single.probe_private = entry->single.probe_private;
/*
* Make sure the private data is valid when we update the
* single probe ptr.
*/
smp_wmb();
- elem->single.func = (*entry)->single.func;
+ elem->single.func = entry->single.func;
/*
* We also make sure that the new probe callbacks array is consistent
* before setting a pointer to it.
*/
- rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, (*entry)->multi);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, entry->multi);
/*
* Update the function or multi probe array pointer before setting the
* ptype.
*/
smp_wmb();
- elem->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
+ elem->ptype = entry->ptype;
elem->state = active;
return 0;
@@ -593,8 +573,7 @@ void marker_update_probe_range(struct marker *begin,
for (iter = begin; iter < end; iter++) {
mark_entry = get_marker(iter->name);
if (mark_entry) {
- set_marker(&mark_entry, iter,
- !!mark_entry->refcount);
+ set_marker(mark_entry, iter, !!mark_entry->refcount);
/*
* ignore error, continue
*/
@@ -656,7 +635,7 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *name, const char *format,
ret = PTR_ERR(entry);
} else if (format) {
if (!entry->format)
- ret = marker_set_format(&entry, format);
+ ret = marker_set_format(entry, format);
else if (strcmp(entry->format, format))
ret = -EPERM;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
2008-10-15 6:56 [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format() Lai Jiangshan
@ 2008-10-15 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-20 8:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2008-10-15 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List
* Lai Jiangshan (laijs@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>
> current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it,
> and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
>
Yep, I think I did put the format string after the name \0, which was
rather tricky. I agree that such change makes the code more readable at
the expense of doing 2 allocations per marker rather than one, but
readability might be a good thing here.
Thanks !
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/marker.c b/kernel/marker.c
> index e49a9c5..ef43c86 100644
> --- a/kernel/marker.c
> +++ b/kernel/marker.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct marker_entry {
> void *oldptr;
> int rcu_pending;
> unsigned char ptype:1;
> + unsigned char format_allocated:1;
> char name[0]; /* Contains name'\0'format'\0' */
> };
>
> @@ -415,6 +416,7 @@ static struct marker_entry *add_marker(const char *name, const char *format)
> e->single.probe_private = NULL;
> e->multi = NULL;
> e->ptype = 0;
> + e->format_allocated = 0;
> e->refcount = 0;
> e->rcu_pending = 0;
> hlist_add_head(&e->hlist, head);
> @@ -446,6 +448,8 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
> if (e->single.func != __mark_empty_function)
> return -EBUSY;
> hlist_del(&e->hlist);
> + if (e->format_allocated)
> + kfree(e->format);
> /* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
> if (e->rcu_pending)
> rcu_barrier_sched();
> @@ -456,57 +460,34 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
> /*
> * Set the mark_entry format to the format found in the element.
> */
> -static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry **entry, const char *format)
> +static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry *entry, const char *format)
> {
> - struct marker_entry *e;
> - size_t name_len = strlen((*entry)->name) + 1;
> - size_t format_len = strlen(format) + 1;
> -
> -
> - e = kmalloc(sizeof(struct marker_entry) + name_len + format_len,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!e)
> + entry->format = kstrdup(format, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!entry->format)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - memcpy(&e->name[0], (*entry)->name, name_len);
> - e->format = &e->name[name_len];
> - memcpy(e->format, format, format_len);
> - if (strcmp(e->format, MARK_NOARGS) == 0)
> - e->call = marker_probe_cb_noarg;
> - else
> - e->call = marker_probe_cb;
> - e->single = (*entry)->single;
> - e->multi = (*entry)->multi;
> - e->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
> - e->refcount = (*entry)->refcount;
> - e->rcu_pending = 0;
> - hlist_add_before(&e->hlist, &(*entry)->hlist);
> - hlist_del(&(*entry)->hlist);
> - /* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
> - if ((*entry)->rcu_pending)
> - rcu_barrier_sched();
> - kfree(*entry);
> - *entry = e;
> + entry->format_allocated = 1;
> +
> trace_mark(core_marker_format, "name %s format %s",
> - e->name, e->format);
> + entry->name, entry->format);
> return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> * Sets the probe callback corresponding to one marker.
> */
> -static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
> +static int set_marker(struct marker_entry *entry, struct marker *elem,
> int active)
> {
> int ret;
> - WARN_ON(strcmp((*entry)->name, elem->name) != 0);
> + WARN_ON(strcmp(entry->name, elem->name) != 0);
>
> - if ((*entry)->format) {
> - if (strcmp((*entry)->format, elem->format) != 0) {
> + if (entry->format) {
> + if (strcmp(entry->format, elem->format) != 0) {
> printk(KERN_NOTICE
> "Format mismatch for probe %s "
> "(%s), marker (%s)\n",
> - (*entry)->name,
> - (*entry)->format,
> + entry->name,
> + entry->format,
> elem->format);
> return -EPERM;
> }
> @@ -522,34 +503,33 @@ static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
> * pass from a "safe" callback (with argument) to an "unsafe"
> * callback (does not set arguments).
> */
> - elem->call = (*entry)->call;
> + elem->call = entry->call;
> /*
> * Sanity check :
> * We only update the single probe private data when the ptr is
> * set to a _non_ single probe! (0 -> 1 and N -> 1, N != 1)
> */
> WARN_ON(elem->single.func != __mark_empty_function
> - && elem->single.probe_private
> - != (*entry)->single.probe_private &&
> - !elem->ptype);
> - elem->single.probe_private = (*entry)->single.probe_private;
> + && elem->single.probe_private != entry->single.probe_private
> + && !elem->ptype);
> + elem->single.probe_private = entry->single.probe_private;
> /*
> * Make sure the private data is valid when we update the
> * single probe ptr.
> */
> smp_wmb();
> - elem->single.func = (*entry)->single.func;
> + elem->single.func = entry->single.func;
> /*
> * We also make sure that the new probe callbacks array is consistent
> * before setting a pointer to it.
> */
> - rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, (*entry)->multi);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, entry->multi);
> /*
> * Update the function or multi probe array pointer before setting the
> * ptype.
> */
> smp_wmb();
> - elem->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
> + elem->ptype = entry->ptype;
> elem->state = active;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -593,8 +573,7 @@ void marker_update_probe_range(struct marker *begin,
> for (iter = begin; iter < end; iter++) {
> mark_entry = get_marker(iter->name);
> if (mark_entry) {
> - set_marker(&mark_entry, iter,
> - !!mark_entry->refcount);
> + set_marker(mark_entry, iter, !!mark_entry->refcount);
> /*
> * ignore error, continue
> */
> @@ -656,7 +635,7 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *name, const char *format,
> ret = PTR_ERR(entry);
> } else if (format) {
> if (!entry->format)
> - ret = marker_set_format(&entry, format);
> + ret = marker_set_format(entry, format);
> else if (strcmp(entry->format, format))
> ret = -EPERM;
> }
>
>
>
>
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
2008-10-15 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
@ 2008-10-20 8:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-20 15:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-20 8:48 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-20 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2008-10-20 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Desnoyers; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>> current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it,
>> and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
>>
>
> Yep, I think I did put the format string after the name \0, which was
> rather tricky. I agree that such change makes the code more readable at
> the expense of doing 2 allocations per marker rather than one, but
> readability might be a good thing here.
this fix did help for readability and made code cleanly.
but it's still 1 allocation per marker_entry when format != NULL.
the previous benefit is not lost.
Thanks, Lai
>
> Thanks !
>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/kernel/marker.c b/kernel/marker.c
>> index e49a9c5..ef43c86 100644
>> --- a/kernel/marker.c
>> +++ b/kernel/marker.c
>> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct marker_entry {
>> void *oldptr;
>> int rcu_pending;
>> unsigned char ptype:1;
>> + unsigned char format_allocated:1;
>> char name[0]; /* Contains name'\0'format'\0' */
>> };
>>
>> @@ -415,6 +416,7 @@ static struct marker_entry *add_marker(const char *name, const char *format)
>> e->single.probe_private = NULL;
>> e->multi = NULL;
>> e->ptype = 0;
>> + e->format_allocated = 0;
>> e->refcount = 0;
>> e->rcu_pending = 0;
>> hlist_add_head(&e->hlist, head);
>> @@ -446,6 +448,8 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
>> if (e->single.func != __mark_empty_function)
>> return -EBUSY;
>> hlist_del(&e->hlist);
>> + if (e->format_allocated)
>> + kfree(e->format);
>> /* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
>> if (e->rcu_pending)
>> rcu_barrier_sched();
>> @@ -456,57 +460,34 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
>> /*
>> * Set the mark_entry format to the format found in the element.
>> */
>> -static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry **entry, const char *format)
>> +static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry *entry, const char *format)
>> {
>> - struct marker_entry *e;
>> - size_t name_len = strlen((*entry)->name) + 1;
>> - size_t format_len = strlen(format) + 1;
>> -
>> -
>> - e = kmalloc(sizeof(struct marker_entry) + name_len + format_len,
>> - GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!e)
>> + entry->format = kstrdup(format, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!entry->format)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> - memcpy(&e->name[0], (*entry)->name, name_len);
>> - e->format = &e->name[name_len];
>> - memcpy(e->format, format, format_len);
>> - if (strcmp(e->format, MARK_NOARGS) == 0)
>> - e->call = marker_probe_cb_noarg;
>> - else
>> - e->call = marker_probe_cb;
>> - e->single = (*entry)->single;
>> - e->multi = (*entry)->multi;
>> - e->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
>> - e->refcount = (*entry)->refcount;
>> - e->rcu_pending = 0;
>> - hlist_add_before(&e->hlist, &(*entry)->hlist);
>> - hlist_del(&(*entry)->hlist);
>> - /* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
>> - if ((*entry)->rcu_pending)
>> - rcu_barrier_sched();
>> - kfree(*entry);
>> - *entry = e;
>> + entry->format_allocated = 1;
>> +
>> trace_mark(core_marker_format, "name %s format %s",
>> - e->name, e->format);
>> + entry->name, entry->format);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> * Sets the probe callback corresponding to one marker.
>> */
>> -static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
>> +static int set_marker(struct marker_entry *entry, struct marker *elem,
>> int active)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> - WARN_ON(strcmp((*entry)->name, elem->name) != 0);
>> + WARN_ON(strcmp(entry->name, elem->name) != 0);
>>
>> - if ((*entry)->format) {
>> - if (strcmp((*entry)->format, elem->format) != 0) {
>> + if (entry->format) {
>> + if (strcmp(entry->format, elem->format) != 0) {
>> printk(KERN_NOTICE
>> "Format mismatch for probe %s "
>> "(%s), marker (%s)\n",
>> - (*entry)->name,
>> - (*entry)->format,
>> + entry->name,
>> + entry->format,
>> elem->format);
>> return -EPERM;
>> }
>> @@ -522,34 +503,33 @@ static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
>> * pass from a "safe" callback (with argument) to an "unsafe"
>> * callback (does not set arguments).
>> */
>> - elem->call = (*entry)->call;
>> + elem->call = entry->call;
>> /*
>> * Sanity check :
>> * We only update the single probe private data when the ptr is
>> * set to a _non_ single probe! (0 -> 1 and N -> 1, N != 1)
>> */
>> WARN_ON(elem->single.func != __mark_empty_function
>> - && elem->single.probe_private
>> - != (*entry)->single.probe_private &&
>> - !elem->ptype);
>> - elem->single.probe_private = (*entry)->single.probe_private;
>> + && elem->single.probe_private != entry->single.probe_private
>> + && !elem->ptype);
>> + elem->single.probe_private = entry->single.probe_private;
>> /*
>> * Make sure the private data is valid when we update the
>> * single probe ptr.
>> */
>> smp_wmb();
>> - elem->single.func = (*entry)->single.func;
>> + elem->single.func = entry->single.func;
>> /*
>> * We also make sure that the new probe callbacks array is consistent
>> * before setting a pointer to it.
>> */
>> - rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, (*entry)->multi);
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, entry->multi);
>> /*
>> * Update the function or multi probe array pointer before setting the
>> * ptype.
>> */
>> smp_wmb();
>> - elem->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
>> + elem->ptype = entry->ptype;
>> elem->state = active;
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -593,8 +573,7 @@ void marker_update_probe_range(struct marker *begin,
>> for (iter = begin; iter < end; iter++) {
>> mark_entry = get_marker(iter->name);
>> if (mark_entry) {
>> - set_marker(&mark_entry, iter,
>> - !!mark_entry->refcount);
>> + set_marker(mark_entry, iter, !!mark_entry->refcount);
>> /*
>> * ignore error, continue
>> */
>> @@ -656,7 +635,7 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *name, const char *format,
>> ret = PTR_ERR(entry);
>> } else if (format) {
>> if (!entry->format)
>> - ret = marker_set_format(&entry, format);
>> + ret = marker_set_format(entry, format);
>> else if (strcmp(entry->format, format))
>> ret = -EPERM;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
2008-10-15 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-20 8:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2008-10-20 8:48 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-20 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lai Jiangshan @ 2008-10-20 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
>> current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it,
>> and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
>>
>
> Yep, I think I did put the format string after the name \0, which was
> rather tricky. I agree that such change makes the code more readable at
> the expense of doing 2 allocations per marker rather than one, but
> readability might be a good thing here.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
>
Hi, Ingo
Do you have any objections against these patches?
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: remove exported symbol marker_probe_cb_noarg()
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: let marker_table be close to its comments
My new patch are being made on the top of these patches.
new patch:
[PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: new callbacks manager
new patch remove a lot code and speed up critical region
and not change any APIs.
new patch change too much code, so I have to wait until all known
patches(which can be applied) have been applied.
Thanks, Lai
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
2008-10-15 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-20 8:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-20 8:48 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2008-10-20 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-10-20 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathieu Desnoyers; +Cc: Lai Jiangshan, Linux Kernel Mailing List
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> * Lai Jiangshan (laijs@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> >
> > current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it,
> > and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
> >
>
> Yep, I think I did put the format string after the name \0, which was
> rather tricky. I agree that such change makes the code more readable at
> the expense of doing 2 allocations per marker rather than one, but
> readability might be a good thing here.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
applied to tip/tracing/markers, thanks!
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format()
2008-10-20 8:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
@ 2008-10-20 15:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2008-10-20 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lai Jiangshan; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List
* Lai Jiangshan (laijs@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Lai Jiangshan (laijs@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> >> current marker_set_format() is complex this patch simplify it,
> >> and decrease the overhead of marker_update_probes().
> >>
> >
> > Yep, I think I did put the format string after the name \0, which was
> > rather tricky. I agree that such change makes the code more readable at
> > the expense of doing 2 allocations per marker rather than one, but
> > readability might be a good thing here.
>
> this fix did help for readability and made code cleanly.
> but it's still 1 allocation per marker_entry when format != NULL.
> the previous benefit is not lost.
>
Yes, but the common case is to have format != NULL, so it's 2 alloc per
marker. :)
Mathieu
> Thanks, Lai
>
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> > Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/kernel/marker.c b/kernel/marker.c
> >> index e49a9c5..ef43c86 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/marker.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/marker.c
> >> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct marker_entry {
> >> void *oldptr;
> >> int rcu_pending;
> >> unsigned char ptype:1;
> >> + unsigned char format_allocated:1;
> >> char name[0]; /* Contains name'\0'format'\0' */
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -415,6 +416,7 @@ static struct marker_entry *add_marker(const char *name, const char *format)
> >> e->single.probe_private = NULL;
> >> e->multi = NULL;
> >> e->ptype = 0;
> >> + e->format_allocated = 0;
> >> e->refcount = 0;
> >> e->rcu_pending = 0;
> >> hlist_add_head(&e->hlist, head);
> >> @@ -446,6 +448,8 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
> >> if (e->single.func != __mark_empty_function)
> >> return -EBUSY;
> >> hlist_del(&e->hlist);
> >> + if (e->format_allocated)
> >> + kfree(e->format);
> >> /* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
> >> if (e->rcu_pending)
> >> rcu_barrier_sched();
> >> @@ -456,57 +460,34 @@ static int remove_marker(const char *name)
> >> /*
> >> * Set the mark_entry format to the format found in the element.
> >> */
> >> -static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry **entry, const char *format)
> >> +static int marker_set_format(struct marker_entry *entry, const char *format)
> >> {
> >> - struct marker_entry *e;
> >> - size_t name_len = strlen((*entry)->name) + 1;
> >> - size_t format_len = strlen(format) + 1;
> >> -
> >> -
> >> - e = kmalloc(sizeof(struct marker_entry) + name_len + format_len,
> >> - GFP_KERNEL);
> >> - if (!e)
> >> + entry->format = kstrdup(format, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!entry->format)
> >> return -ENOMEM;
> >> - memcpy(&e->name[0], (*entry)->name, name_len);
> >> - e->format = &e->name[name_len];
> >> - memcpy(e->format, format, format_len);
> >> - if (strcmp(e->format, MARK_NOARGS) == 0)
> >> - e->call = marker_probe_cb_noarg;
> >> - else
> >> - e->call = marker_probe_cb;
> >> - e->single = (*entry)->single;
> >> - e->multi = (*entry)->multi;
> >> - e->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
> >> - e->refcount = (*entry)->refcount;
> >> - e->rcu_pending = 0;
> >> - hlist_add_before(&e->hlist, &(*entry)->hlist);
> >> - hlist_del(&(*entry)->hlist);
> >> - /* Make sure the call_rcu has been executed */
> >> - if ((*entry)->rcu_pending)
> >> - rcu_barrier_sched();
> >> - kfree(*entry);
> >> - *entry = e;
> >> + entry->format_allocated = 1;
> >> +
> >> trace_mark(core_marker_format, "name %s format %s",
> >> - e->name, e->format);
> >> + entry->name, entry->format);
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Sets the probe callback corresponding to one marker.
> >> */
> >> -static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
> >> +static int set_marker(struct marker_entry *entry, struct marker *elem,
> >> int active)
> >> {
> >> int ret;
> >> - WARN_ON(strcmp((*entry)->name, elem->name) != 0);
> >> + WARN_ON(strcmp(entry->name, elem->name) != 0);
> >>
> >> - if ((*entry)->format) {
> >> - if (strcmp((*entry)->format, elem->format) != 0) {
> >> + if (entry->format) {
> >> + if (strcmp(entry->format, elem->format) != 0) {
> >> printk(KERN_NOTICE
> >> "Format mismatch for probe %s "
> >> "(%s), marker (%s)\n",
> >> - (*entry)->name,
> >> - (*entry)->format,
> >> + entry->name,
> >> + entry->format,
> >> elem->format);
> >> return -EPERM;
> >> }
> >> @@ -522,34 +503,33 @@ static int set_marker(struct marker_entry **entry, struct marker *elem,
> >> * pass from a "safe" callback (with argument) to an "unsafe"
> >> * callback (does not set arguments).
> >> */
> >> - elem->call = (*entry)->call;
> >> + elem->call = entry->call;
> >> /*
> >> * Sanity check :
> >> * We only update the single probe private data when the ptr is
> >> * set to a _non_ single probe! (0 -> 1 and N -> 1, N != 1)
> >> */
> >> WARN_ON(elem->single.func != __mark_empty_function
> >> - && elem->single.probe_private
> >> - != (*entry)->single.probe_private &&
> >> - !elem->ptype);
> >> - elem->single.probe_private = (*entry)->single.probe_private;
> >> + && elem->single.probe_private != entry->single.probe_private
> >> + && !elem->ptype);
> >> + elem->single.probe_private = entry->single.probe_private;
> >> /*
> >> * Make sure the private data is valid when we update the
> >> * single probe ptr.
> >> */
> >> smp_wmb();
> >> - elem->single.func = (*entry)->single.func;
> >> + elem->single.func = entry->single.func;
> >> /*
> >> * We also make sure that the new probe callbacks array is consistent
> >> * before setting a pointer to it.
> >> */
> >> - rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, (*entry)->multi);
> >> + rcu_assign_pointer(elem->multi, entry->multi);
> >> /*
> >> * Update the function or multi probe array pointer before setting the
> >> * ptype.
> >> */
> >> smp_wmb();
> >> - elem->ptype = (*entry)->ptype;
> >> + elem->ptype = entry->ptype;
> >> elem->state = active;
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> @@ -593,8 +573,7 @@ void marker_update_probe_range(struct marker *begin,
> >> for (iter = begin; iter < end; iter++) {
> >> mark_entry = get_marker(iter->name);
> >> if (mark_entry) {
> >> - set_marker(&mark_entry, iter,
> >> - !!mark_entry->refcount);
> >> + set_marker(mark_entry, iter, !!mark_entry->refcount);
> >> /*
> >> * ignore error, continue
> >> */
> >> @@ -656,7 +635,7 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *name, const char *format,
> >> ret = PTR_ERR(entry);
> >> } else if (format) {
> >> if (!entry->format)
> >> - ret = marker_set_format(&entry, format);
> >> + ret = marker_set_format(entry, format);
> >> else if (strcmp(entry->format, format))
> >> ret = -EPERM;
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-20 15:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-15 6:56 [PATCH tip/tracing/markers] markers: simplify marker_set_format() Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-15 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-20 8:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-20 15:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-20 8:48 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-20 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox