From: "Jonathan Johnson" <johnsonn@matc.edu>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, <mingo@elte.hu>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<trimarchimichael@yahoo.it>
Subject: Re: commit f6121f4f8708195e88cbdf8dd8d171b226b3f858 upstream
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:55:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FD98FA.8C56.0056.0@matc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224575797.6629.9.camel@Palanthas>
Hello all,
sched_rt.c: resch needed in rt_rq_enqueue() for the root rt_rq
commit f6121f4f8708195e88cbdf8dd8d171b226b3f858 upstream
Many previous kernels up to and include 2.6.27.1 have had a "wa" time of 48-50% based on top or vmstat 1 100(last column heading, on the right).
After applying kernel 2.6.27.2 the read "wa" time has dropped for reads down to 0%-10%. After reading the changelog
I used the same .config for this kernel as several previous ones.
I figured it must be this commit that made the different, since there are only about 12 commits and this seem most likely.
THANK YOU
However, the "wa" times remain at 40%-50%(50% maybe 100% of one CPU core and its a dual) for writing and/or output. I don't know if there is a corresponding queue for writing or output,
but it also needs examining. I don't know how it related to reading from the hard drive either, but it was a dramatic improvement. Given that all on my hardware is almost "top-of-the-line", I
don't believe my hardware is at fault for the high "wa"(waiting for data).
My write speed especially to my RAID 6 seems to get worse and worse. I have all the same and supported hard drives. My original array had 6 mismatched drives at 20-24mb/s write speed.
I replaced them with 4 1TB drives and now write speed is under 100k/s especially when tranmitting data to this computer over the network.
I know some C++, but have never debug a program on this scale, and don't even know how to start. Any advice would be appreciated.
Later,
Jonathan
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-21 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <48FCA742.8C56.0056.0@matc.edu>
[not found] ` <20081020204516.GA21825@suse.de>
[not found] ` <1224575797.6629.9.camel@Palanthas>
2008-10-21 13:55 ` Jonathan Johnson [this message]
2008-10-23 8:39 ` commit f6121f4f8708195e88cbdf8dd8d171b226b3f858 upstream Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48FD98FA.8C56.0056.0@matc.edu \
--to=johnsonn@matc.edu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trimarchimichael@yahoo.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox