From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/proc: fix /proc/cpuinfo cpu offline bug
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:39:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FEAE6B.70809@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7baa9c80810170544q1eaec469vc3a1ad2cba8e4ee0@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Ingo and Alexey,
I have changed my changelog. please review again.
Thanks, Lai.
Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:55:25PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> In my test, I found that if a cpu has been offline,
>>> the next cpus may not be shown in the /proc/cpuinfo.
>>>
>>> trivially reproduce this bug:
>>>
>>> 1) add these lines in the end of show_cpuinfo()
>>> if (m->size - m->count - 20 > 0)
>>> seq_printf(m, "%*s", (int)(m->size - m->count - 20), "show bug\n");
>> What is it?
>>
>> Can you just show wrong /proc/cpuinfo ?
>>
>> Can someone with at least 4-way box please do so?
>
> this is not wrong /proc/cpuinfo, this is an enlarged /proc/cpuinfo
> this trivial example just use "show bug\n" as the enlarged content.
>
> if you boot your machine with enough cpu, your /proc/cpuinfo
> have been enlarged too, please use this:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> nr_cpus=16 # i386
> for ((i=1; i<nr_cpus; i++))
> do
> echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online
> cpus=$(grep processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l)
> (( cpus == nr_cpus -1 )) || break; # bug eccur
> echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online
> done
> cat /proc/cpuinfo # it shows this bug.
>
> Lai
>
>>> 3) offline cpu#1
>>> 4) cat /proc/cpuinfo
>>> cpu#2 and cpu#3 .... cannot be shown in /proc/cpuinfo
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
>>> @@ -160,14 +160,16 @@ static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>>> {
>>> if (*pos == 0) /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
>>> *pos = first_cpu(cpu_online_map);
>>> - if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(*pos))
>>> + else
>>> + *pos = next_cpu_nr(*pos - 1, cpu_online_map);
>>> + if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
>>> return &cpu_data(*pos);
>>> return NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void *c_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>>> {
>>> - *pos = next_cpu(*pos, cpu_online_map);
>>> + (*pos)++;
>>> return c_start(m, pos);
>>> }
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 8:55 [PATCH] x86/proc: fix /proc/cpuinfo cpu offline bug Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-17 11:41 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-10-17 12:44 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-22 4:39 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2008-10-22 4:42 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48FEAE6B.70809@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox