* sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
@ 2008-10-21 18:45 henrik
2008-10-21 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: henrik @ 2008-10-21 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, Henrik Austad
From: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
not set.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index c226c7b..9e0e33c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -898,8 +898,9 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
-
+#endif
void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync);
struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task) (struct rq *rq);
--
1.6.0.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
2008-10-21 18:45 sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency henrik
@ 2008-10-21 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 7:25 ` Li Zefan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2008-10-21 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: henrik; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel, Henrik Austad
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:45 +0200, henrik@austad.us wrote:
> From: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
>
> Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
> not set.
While a proper cleanup, could you do it by re-arranging the methods so
as to not create an additional ifdef?
Thanks
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index c226c7b..9e0e33c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -898,8 +898,9 @@ struct sched_class {
> void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
> void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
> -
> +#endif
> void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync);
>
> struct task_struct * (*pick_next_task) (struct rq *rq);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
2008-10-21 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2008-10-22 7:25 ` Li Zefan
2008-10-22 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Li Zefan @ 2008-10-22 7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, henrik, linux-kernel, Henrik Austad
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:45 +0200, henrik@austad.us wrote:
>> From: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
>>
>> Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
>> not set.
>
Not only select_task_rq(), but also set_cpus_allowed(), rq_online() and
rq_offline().
> While a proper cleanup, could you do it by re-arranging the methods so
> as to not create an additional ifdef?
>
How about the following patch?
==================
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:13:06 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] make CONFIG_SMP consistent for sched_class methods
Do not declare select_task_rq and some other methods as part of sched_class
when CONFIG_SMP is not set.
Also gather those methods to avoid CONFIG_SMP mess.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++-----
kernel/sched_fair.c | 5 ++---
kernel/sched_idletask.c | 5 ++---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 5 ++---
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5c38db5..fc1a615 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -941,7 +941,6 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
- int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync);
@@ -949,6 +948,8 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*put_prev_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
+
unsigned long (*load_balance) (struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu,
struct rq *busiest, unsigned long max_load_move,
struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
@@ -960,16 +961,17 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
void (*task_wake_up) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
-#endif
- void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
- void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
- void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*set_cpus_allowed)(struct task_struct *p,
const cpumask_t *newmask);
void (*rq_online)(struct rq *rq);
void (*rq_offline)(struct rq *rq);
+#endif
+
+ void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
+ void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
+ void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int running);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index f604dae..73bef78 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1576,9 +1576,6 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_fair,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_fair,
.yield_task = yield_task_fair,
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
@@ -1586,6 +1583,8 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_fair,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
+
.load_balance = load_balance_fair,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_fair,
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched_idletask.c b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
index dec4cca..8a21a2e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_idletask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
@@ -105,9 +105,6 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
/* dequeue is not valid, we print a debug message there: */
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_idle,
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_idle,
@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_idle,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
+
.load_balance = load_balance_idle,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_idle,
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index b446dc8..d9ba9d5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -1504,9 +1504,6 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_rt,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_rt,
.yield_task = yield_task_rt,
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_rt,
@@ -1514,6 +1511,8 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_rt,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
+
.load_balance = load_balance_rt,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_rt,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_rt,
--
1.5.4.rc3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
2008-10-22 7:25 ` Li Zefan
@ 2008-10-22 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 8:00 ` Henrik Austad
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-10-22 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zefan; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, henrik, linux-kernel, Henrik Austad
* Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> How about the following patch?
i've applied it in the form below. Peter, does it look good to you too?
Ingo
-------------->
>From 667ff69f5a248fde6cf871f2c9c5c5d2aa182e71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:25:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
a patch from Henrik Austad did this:
>> Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
>> not set.
Peter observed:
> While a proper cleanup, could you do it by re-arranging the methods so
> as to not create an additional ifdef?
Do not declare select_task_rq and some other methods as part of sched_class
when CONFIG_SMP is not set.
Also gather those methods to avoid CONFIG_SMP mess.
Idea-by: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++-----
kernel/sched_fair.c | 5 ++---
kernel/sched_idletask.c | 5 ++---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 5 ++---
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4f59c8e..c05b45f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -897,7 +897,6 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
- int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync);
@@ -905,6 +904,8 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*put_prev_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
+
unsigned long (*load_balance) (struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu,
struct rq *busiest, unsigned long max_load_move,
struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
@@ -916,16 +917,17 @@ struct sched_class {
void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
void (*task_wake_up) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
-#endif
- void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
- void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
- void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*set_cpus_allowed)(struct task_struct *p,
const cpumask_t *newmask);
void (*rq_online)(struct rq *rq);
void (*rq_offline)(struct rq *rq);
+#endif
+
+ void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
+ void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
+ void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
int running);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index a0aa38b..8de48a5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1593,9 +1593,6 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_fair,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_fair,
.yield_task = yield_task_fair,
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
@@ -1603,6 +1600,8 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_fair,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
+
.load_balance = load_balance_fair,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_fair,
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched_idletask.c b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
index dec4cca..8a21a2e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_idletask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
@@ -105,9 +105,6 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
/* dequeue is not valid, we print a debug message there: */
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_idle,
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_idle,
@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_idle,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
+
.load_balance = load_balance_idle,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_idle,
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index cdf5740..c9aa5be 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -1502,9 +1502,6 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.enqueue_task = enqueue_task_rt,
.dequeue_task = dequeue_task_rt,
.yield_task = yield_task_rt,
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
.check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_rt,
@@ -1512,6 +1509,8 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
.put_prev_task = put_prev_task_rt,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
+
.load_balance = load_balance_rt,
.move_one_task = move_one_task_rt,
.set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_rt,
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
2008-10-22 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-10-22 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 8:00 ` Henrik Austad
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2008-10-22 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Li Zefan, henrik, linux-kernel, Henrik Austad
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 09:36 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > How about the following patch?
>
> i've applied it in the form below. Peter, does it look good to you too?
yeah,. looks good, thanks guys!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
2008-10-22 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2008-10-22 8:00 ` Henrik Austad
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Henrik Austad @ 2008-10-22 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Li Zefan, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 09:36:40 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > How about the following patch?
>
> i've applied it in the form below. Peter, does it look good to you too?
>
> Ingo
FWIW:
Acked-by Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Not boot-tested, just build-tested.
>
> -------------->
> From 667ff69f5a248fde6cf871f2c9c5c5d2aa182e71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:25:26 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency
>
> a patch from Henrik Austad did this:
>
> >> Do not declare select_task_rq as part of sched_class when CONFIG_SMP is
> >> not set.
>
> Peter observed:
>
> > While a proper cleanup, could you do it by re-arranging the methods so
> > as to not create an additional ifdef?
>
> Do not declare select_task_rq and some other methods as part of sched_class
> when CONFIG_SMP is not set.
>
> Also gather those methods to avoid CONFIG_SMP mess.
>
> Idea-by: Henrik Austad <henrik.austad@gmail.com>
can you change this to henrik@austad.us? (sorry for error in first patch.. :-))
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 12 +++++++-----
> kernel/sched_fair.c | 5 ++---
> kernel/sched_idletask.c | 5 ++---
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 5 ++---
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 4f59c8e..c05b45f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -897,7 +897,6 @@ struct sched_class {
> void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
> void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
> - int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
>
> void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync);
>
> @@ -905,6 +904,8 @@ struct sched_class {
> void (*put_prev_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + int (*select_task_rq)(struct task_struct *p, int sync);
> +
> unsigned long (*load_balance) (struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu,
> struct rq *busiest, unsigned long max_load_move,
> struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
> @@ -916,16 +917,17 @@ struct sched_class {
> void (*pre_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
> void (*post_schedule) (struct rq *this_rq);
> void (*task_wake_up) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task);
> -#endif
>
> - void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
> - void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
> - void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
> void (*set_cpus_allowed)(struct task_struct *p,
> const cpumask_t *newmask);
>
> void (*rq_online)(struct rq *rq);
> void (*rq_offline)(struct rq *rq);
> +#endif
> +
> + void (*set_curr_task) (struct rq *rq);
> + void (*task_tick) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued);
> + void (*task_new) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
>
> void (*switched_from) (struct rq *this_rq, struct task_struct *task,
> int running);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index a0aa38b..8de48a5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1593,9 +1593,6 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
> .enqueue_task = enqueue_task_fair,
> .dequeue_task = dequeue_task_fair,
> .yield_task = yield_task_fair,
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> .check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
>
> @@ -1603,6 +1600,8 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
> .put_prev_task = put_prev_task_fair,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_fair,
> +
> .load_balance = load_balance_fair,
> .move_one_task = move_one_task_fair,
> #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_idletask.c b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> index dec4cca..8a21a2e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_idletask.c
> @@ -105,9 +105,6 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
>
> /* dequeue is not valid, we print a debug message there: */
> .dequeue_task = dequeue_task_idle,
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> .check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_idle,
>
> @@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ static const struct sched_class idle_sched_class = {
> .put_prev_task = put_prev_task_idle,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_idle,
> +
> .load_balance = load_balance_idle,
> .move_one_task = move_one_task_idle,
> #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index cdf5740..c9aa5be 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1502,9 +1502,6 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
> .enqueue_task = enqueue_task_rt,
> .dequeue_task = dequeue_task_rt,
> .yield_task = yield_task_rt,
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
> -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> .check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_curr_rt,
>
> @@ -1512,6 +1509,8 @@ static const struct sched_class rt_sched_class = {
> .put_prev_task = put_prev_task_rt,
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + .select_task_rq = select_task_rq_rt,
> +
> .load_balance = load_balance_rt,
> .move_one_task = move_one_task_rt,
> .set_cpus_allowed = set_cpus_allowed_rt,
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-22 8:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-21 18:45 sched: add CONFIG_SMP consistency henrik
2008-10-21 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 7:25 ` Li Zefan
2008-10-22 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-22 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 8:00 ` Henrik Austad
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox