public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Edmon <harry@atmos.washington.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SUNRPC problem with 2.6.26 and beyond - try again with response in correct place.
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:27:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FFD2E4.6080000@atmos.washington.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224718666.7525.30.camel@localhost>

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 15:55 -0700, Harry Edmon wrote:
>   
>> Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 08:35 -0700, Harry Edmon wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> I have a dual quad-core Xeon system running software 
>>>> (http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/ldm) that relays and processes 
>>>> weather data through RPC calls, keeping a queue of data in a memory 
>>>> mapped file.  Up until 2.6.26 the system has run just fine (for example 
>>>> 2.6.25.17).  But starting with 2.6.26 through 2.6.27.2 the system runs 
>>>> into a problem after approximately 24 hours.  The symptom is that the 
>>>> processing slows down to a crawl.  Using "top" I can see that the System 
>>>> time is up over 90%, with almost no User and Wait time.  If I stop and 
>>>> restart the software, most of the time it gets better - but sometimes it 
>>>> takes a reboot to fix the problem.  I have an identical system that does 
>>>> just processing and ingesting data from remote systems, and it does not 
>>>> have this problem.  I have tried a number of different kernel 
>>>> configurations, but they all show the same problem.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect a problem with SUNRPC.  I notice that there were a large 
>>>> number of SUNRPC patches in 2.6.26.  I am looking for suggestions on how 
>>>> to pin down which patches are causing the problem.  Are there ways to 
>>>> figure where in the  kernel the time is being spent?  I am will to work 
>>>> on isolating the problem, but I need some suggestions on the best way to 
>>>> do it given the large number of SUNRPC patches in 2.6.26 and the fact 
>>>> that each experiment takes a day.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> The kernel sunrpc interface is not exported to user land: the glibc code
>>> uses its own, entirely separate implementation of sunrpc.
>>>
>>> I cannot therefore see, how your application's RPC calls can be affected
>>> by kernel sunrpc changes.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>   Trond
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Then how do you explain the the large system time used with 2.6.26 and 
>> beyond?  Is it some other patch I should be looking at?
>>     
>
> I'm not explaining it. I'm saying that nothing outside the kernel NFS
> and NLM code uses the kernel sunrpc implementation. Your userland RPC
> calls are using glibc's implementation of sunrpc. Those are unaffected
> by patches to the kernel sunrpc layer.
>
> If you are seeing a hang, then I suggest you start by using the strace
> utility to figure out which system call is actually involved.
>
> Cheers
>   Trond
>
>   
The problem is that it is not hanging.  The processes are running 
through a lot of systems calls.  It is just that the system time jumps 
up to over 95% on all 8 processors with 2.6.26 and beyond.  I never see 
that with 2.6.25.17.  I will try looking again and see if there are 
certain calls that are taking a lot of time.

      reply	other threads:[~2008-10-23  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-22 15:35 SUNRPC problem with 2.6.26 and beyond Harry Edmon
2008-10-22 22:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-10-22 22:54   ` Harry Edmon
2008-10-22 22:55   ` SUNRPC problem with 2.6.26 and beyond - try again with response in correct place Harry Edmon
2008-10-22 23:37     ` Trond Myklebust
2008-10-23  1:27       ` Harry Edmon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48FFD2E4.6080000@atmos.washington.edu \
    --to=harry@atmos.washington.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox