From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Implement cpumask_next_andnot
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 20:47:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48ffca41-da1a-4ee6-b0aa-5ad0be035c7d@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ztdjd9s-eLKrTU9g@yury-ThinkPad>
On 2024-09-03 15:28, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:06:49PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Allow finding the next bit within two input cpumasks which is
>> respectively one and zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
>
> Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Thanks for the ack. However based on our discussion in the other
leg of this thread, I can simply use
+ for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, cpumask, mm_allowed)
+ nr_set += !cpumask_test_and_set_cpu(cpu, mm_allowed);
which is already present in the API. I will drop this patch from
my series.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>> ---
>> include/linux/cpumask.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> index 23686bed441d..5da1c66cfa65 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> @@ -246,6 +246,23 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_next_zero(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
>> return find_next_zero_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), small_cpumask_bits, n+1);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * cpumask_next_andnot - return the next cpu from *srcp1 & ~*srcp2
>> + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
>> + * @src1p: the first input
>> + * @src2p: the second input
>> + *
>> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus match in both.
>> + */
>> +static __always_inline
>> +unsigned int cpumask_next_andnot(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp1, const struct cpumask *srcp2)
>> +{
>> + /* -1 is a legal arg here. */
>> + if (n != -1)
>> + cpumask_check(n);
>> + return find_next_andnot_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp1), cpumask_bits(srcp2), small_cpumask_bits, n+1);
>> +}
>> +
>> #if NR_CPUS == 1
>> /* Uniprocessor: there is only one valid CPU */
>> static inline unsigned int cpumask_local_spread(unsigned int i, int node)
>> --
>> 2.39.2
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-03 19:06 [RFC PATCH 0/2] sched: Improve cache locality of RSEQ concurrency IDs Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-03 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] cpumask: Implement cpumask_next_andnot Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-03 19:28 ` Yury Norov
2024-09-04 0:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2024-09-03 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve cache locality of RSEQ concurrency IDs for intermittent workloads Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-03 19:59 ` Yury Norov
2024-09-03 23:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-04 15:24 ` Yury Norov
2024-09-04 15:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-04 18:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-09-05 13:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48ffca41-da1a-4ee6-b0aa-5ad0be035c7d@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox