From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754964AbYJWPTh (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:19:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751318AbYJWPT1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:19:27 -0400 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:39995 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751254AbYJWPT0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:19:26 -0400 Message-ID: <49009639.3050603@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:20:25 -0700 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct cpumask References: <20081023020826.051012000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> <20081023125529.GA18327@elte.hu> <20081023142025.GA18804@elte.hu> <200810240201.15037.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200810240201.15037.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell wrote: > On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote: >> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive >> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes: > > Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various arch > changes for this reason. > >> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked: >> >> 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid > > Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is just > porting the changes across to your tree now. > > Cheers, > Rusty. Hi Ingo, It would seem easier to back out previous patches and apply the replacements. Does this work for you? Thanks, Mike