public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:03:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4906F194.30901@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f17812d70810271802v75b08712l4ab243802f59ecce@mail.gmail.com>


Changes the device registration part of the probe function to supply the
regulator device rather than its parent (the mfd device) as this caused
problems when the regulator core attempted to find constraints associated
with the regulators.

Signed-of-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>

--
Version 2 applying Eric Miao's suggestion about using an inline function.
Change made in couple of additional places I'd missed the first time.


diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da903x.c b/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
index 3688e33..773b29c 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
@@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ struct da903x_regulator_info {
 	int	enable_bit;
 };
 
+static inline struct device *to_da903x_dev(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+	return rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
+}
+
 static inline int check_range(struct da903x_regulator_info *info,
 				int min_uV, int max_uV)
 {
@@ -93,7 +98,7 @@ static int da903x_set_ldo_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 				  int min_uV, int max_uV)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 
 	if (check_range(info, min_uV, max_uV)) {
@@ -111,7 +116,7 @@ static int da903x_set_ldo_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 static int da903x_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -128,7 +133,7 @@ static int da903x_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 static int da903x_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 
 	return da903x_set_bits(da9034_dev, info->enable_reg,
 					1 << info->enable_bit);
@@ -137,7 +142,7 @@ static int da903x_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 static int da903x_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 
 	return da903x_clr_bits(da9034_dev, info->enable_reg,
 					1 << info->enable_bit);
@@ -146,7 +151,7 @@ static int da903x_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 static int da903x_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t reg_val;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -162,7 +167,7 @@ static int da9030_set_ldo1_15_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 				       int min_uV, int max_uV)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da903x_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da903x_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -189,7 +194,7 @@ static int da9030_set_ldo14_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 				  int min_uV, int max_uV)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da903x_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da903x_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 	int thresh;
 
@@ -215,7 +220,7 @@ static int da9030_set_ldo14_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 static int da9030_get_ldo14_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da903x_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da903x_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -238,7 +243,7 @@ static int da9034_set_dvc_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 				  int min_uV, int max_uV)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -264,7 +269,7 @@ static int da9034_set_ldo12_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 				    int min_uV, int max_uV)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 
 	if (check_range(info, min_uV, max_uV)) {
@@ -283,7 +288,7 @@ static int da9034_set_ldo12_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 static int da9034_get_ldo12_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 {
 	struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
-	struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
+	struct device *da9034_dev = to_da903x_dev(rdev);
 	uint8_t val, mask;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -466,7 +471,7 @@ static int __devinit da903x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ri->desc.id == DA9030_ID_LDO1 || ri->desc.id == DA9030_ID_LDO15)
 		ri->desc.ops = &da9030_regulator_ldo1_15_ops;
 
-	rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, pdev->dev.parent, ri);
+	rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, &pdev->dev, ri);
 	if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register regulator %s\n",
 				ri->desc.name);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-28 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-24 15:47 Da903x regulator driver. Bug? Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-24 17:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-24 18:24   ` Liam Girdwood
2008-10-24 18:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-24 19:44       ` Mark Brown
2008-10-27 15:29 ` [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-28  1:01   ` Eric Miao
2008-10-28  1:02     ` Eric Miao
2008-10-28 10:40       ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-28 11:03       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2008-10-28 11:19         ` Liam Girdwood
2008-10-28 12:21           ` Eric Miao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4906F194.30901@cam.ac.uk \
    --to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox