Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-10-26T12:23:22Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 827 bytes --]

Hi.

> > > > > > vanilla 27: 347.222
> > > > > > no TSO/GSO: 357.331
> > > > > > no hrticks: 382.983
> > > > > > no balance: 389.802
> >
> > Can anyone please tell me if there was any conclusion of this thread?
>
> For the reference, just pulled git tree (4403b4 commit): 361.184
> and with dirty_ratio set to 50: 361.086
> without scheduler domain tuning things are essentially the same: 361.367
>
> So, things are getting worse with time, and previous tunes do not help
> anymore.

That's the picture, how we go on my hardware:
4 (2 physical, 2 logical hyper-threaded) 32-bit xeons 8gb of ram.
We probably can be a little bit better for -rc1 kernel though,
if I enable only 4gb via config.

Better one time to see than 1000 times to read. One can scare children
with our graphs... Picture attached.

--
Evgeniy Polyakov

[-- Attachment #2: tbench-regression-2.6.27-rc1.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 4996 bytes --]