Re: eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4

[Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>]

Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> Em Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:33:11 -0200
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> escreveu:
>
> | On Mon, 03 Nov 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> | > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:02:29PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> | > > Right now, you should still rfkill_force_state().  Please wait for an hour
> | > > or two while I clean up that broken resume handling, and I will tell you for
> | > > sure.
> | > 
> | > Cool. I'll hold off posting my cleanups until then in that case.
> | 
> | Ok, two bugs reproduced, the fixes are ready and tested, and I will be
> | sending it now to linux-wireless.  You're in the CC, so you will get them.
> | 
> | I will also need to send patches for -stable, as the ones for mainline won't
> | apply to -stable.
>
>  Great.
>
>  Do the patches have anything to do with the problem I have reported?
>   

No.  These patches don't affect what happens when the rfkill device is
unregistered.

>  Rafael has opened a bugzilla ticket for it:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11928
>