Re: tty warning

[Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>]

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> A sparc allmodconfig build gives these warnings:
>
> drivers/char/n_tty.c: In function 'n_tty_poll':
> drivers/char/n_tty.c:1592: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/n_tty.c:1601: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/n_tty.c: In function 'n_tty_read':
> drivers/char/n_tty.c:1306: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c: In function 'set_termios':
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:574: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:578: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c: In function 'tty_mode_ioctl':
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:729: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:963: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:969: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:618: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:1007: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
> drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:1015: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
>
> These are things like:
>
>                 termios->c_cc[VTIME] = 0;
>
> termios is a (struct ktermios *) which has "cc_t c_cc[NCCS];".  NCCS is
> 17 and VTIME is also 17.  I assume the intention is to actually fill in
> _x_cc[0], but why is it done this way and not more directly?
>
>   
There is a patch here that fixes it:  
http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparc&m=122048348932653&w=2