Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned long __meminitdata table
>>  static unsigned long __meminitdata table_top;
>>  
>>  static int __initdata after_init_bootmem;
>> +int after_bootmem;
>>  
>>  static __init void *alloc_low_page(unsigned long *phys)
>>  {
>> @@ -987,6 +988,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>>  
>>  	set_highmem_pages_init();
>>  
>> +	after_bootmem = 1;
> 
> this hack can go away once we have a proper percpu_alloc() that can be 
> used early enough.
> 

Also, flags should be "bool".  We're not aggressively going after old
code to convert it, but new code should use "bool".

	-hpa