* sparc/staging compile error @ 2008-11-06 5:36 Stephen Rothwell 2008-11-06 6:37 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-11-06 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, sparclinux [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 282 bytes --] Hi Greg, Today's tree from Linus gets the following error from a sparc allmodconfig build: ERROR: "___f_flush_cache_range" [drivers/staging/poch/poch.ko] undefined! -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-06 5:36 sparc/staging compile error Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-11-06 6:37 ` Greg KH 2008-11-06 6:39 ` David Miller 2008-11-06 10:32 ` Paul Mackerras 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2008-11-06 6:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, sparclinux On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:36:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's tree from Linus gets the following error from a sparc > allmodconfig build: > > ERROR: "___f_flush_cache_range" [drivers/staging/poch/poch.ko] undefined! Odd, is flush_cache_range() not allowed on the sparc platform? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-06 6:37 ` Greg KH @ 2008-11-06 6:39 ` David Miller 2008-11-06 10:32 ` Paul Mackerras 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: David Miller @ 2008-11-06 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: greg; +Cc: sfr, linux-kernel, wli, sparclinux From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:37:09 -0800 > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:36:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Today's tree from Linus gets the following error from a sparc > > allmodconfig build: > > > > ERROR: "___f_flush_cache_range" [drivers/staging/poch/poch.ko] undefined! > > Odd, is flush_cache_range() not allowed on the sparc platform? No, just nobody used it from a module before. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-06 6:37 ` Greg KH 2008-11-06 6:39 ` David Miller @ 2008-11-06 10:32 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-11-06 14:06 ` J.R. Mauro 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Paul Mackerras @ 2008-11-06 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: Stephen Rothwell, LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, sparclinux Greg KH writes: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:36:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Today's tree from Linus gets the following error from a sparc > > allmodconfig build: > > > > ERROR: "___f_flush_cache_range" [drivers/staging/poch/poch.ko] undefined! > > Odd, is flush_cache_range() not allowed on the sparc platform? I'm curious, what is a driver doing calling flush_cache_range()? What does it expect it to do precisely? Paul. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-06 10:32 ` Paul Mackerras @ 2008-11-06 14:06 ` J.R. Mauro 2008-11-06 17:32 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: J.R. Mauro @ 2008-11-06 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Greg KH, Stephen Rothwell, LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, sparclinux On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > Greg KH writes: > >> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:36:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > Hi Greg, >> > >> > Today's tree from Linus gets the following error from a sparc >> > allmodconfig build: >> > >> > ERROR: "___f_flush_cache_range" [drivers/staging/poch/poch.ko] undefined! >> >> Odd, is flush_cache_range() not allowed on the sparc platform? > > I'm curious, what is a driver doing calling flush_cache_range()? > What does it expect it to do precisely? It's part of the driver's ioctl. Relevant lines: static int poch_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { /* ---snip---*/ case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_USER: case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_DEVICE: vms = find_vma(current->mm, arg); if (!vms) /* Address not mapped. */ return -EINVAL; if (vms->vm_file != filp) /* Address mapped from different device/file. */ return -EINVAL; flush_cache_range(vms, arg, arg + channel->group_size); > > Paul. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-06 14:06 ` J.R. Mauro @ 2008-11-06 17:32 ` Christoph Hellwig 2008-11-06 17:36 ` J.R. Mauro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-11-06 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: J.R. Mauro Cc: Paul Mackerras, Greg KH, Stephen Rothwell, LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, sparclinux On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:06:36AM -0500, J.R. Mauro wrote: > static int poch_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > { > /* ---snip---*/ > case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_USER: > case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_DEVICE: > vms = find_vma(current->mm, arg); > if (!vms) > /* Address not mapped. */ > return -EINVAL; > if (vms->vm_file != filp) > /* Address mapped from different device/file. */ > return -EINVAL; > > flush_cache_range(vms, arg, arg + channel->group_size); This doesn't look like something a driver should ever do. Could someone explain what it's trying to do from a high level point of view? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-06 17:32 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-11-06 17:36 ` J.R. Mauro 2008-11-07 8:40 ` Vijay Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: J.R. Mauro @ 2008-11-06 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Paul Mackerras, Greg KH, Stephen Rothwell, LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, vijaykumar, jayakumar.lkml, sparclinux On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:06:36AM -0500, J.R. Mauro wrote: >> static int poch_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, >> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) >> { >> /* ---snip---*/ >> case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_USER: >> case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_DEVICE: >> vms = find_vma(current->mm, arg); >> if (!vms) >> /* Address not mapped. */ >> return -EINVAL; >> if (vms->vm_file != filp) >> /* Address mapped from different device/file. */ >> return -EINVAL; >> >> flush_cache_range(vms, arg, arg + channel->group_size); > > This doesn't look like something a driver should ever do. Could someone > explain what it's trying to do from a high level point of view? > > CC'd driver maintainers mentioned in the README ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-06 17:36 ` J.R. Mauro @ 2008-11-07 8:40 ` Vijay Kumar 2008-11-07 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Vijay Kumar @ 2008-11-07 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: J.R. Mauro Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Paul Mackerras, Greg KH, Stephen Rothwell, LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, jayakumar.lkml, sparclinux J.R. Mauro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:06:36AM -0500, J.R. Mauro wrote: >>> static int poch_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, >>> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) >>> { >>> /* ---snip---*/ >>> case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_USER: >>> case POCH_IOC_SYNC_GROUP_FOR_DEVICE: >>> vms = find_vma(current->mm, arg); >>> if (!vms) >>> /* Address not mapped. */ >>> return -EINVAL; >>> if (vms->vm_file != filp) >>> /* Address mapped from different device/file. */ >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> flush_cache_range(vms, arg, arg + channel->group_size); >> This doesn't look like something a driver should ever do. Could someone >> explain what it's trying to do from a high level point of view? > > CC'd driver maintainers mentioned in the README May be the code is not doing what is supposed to do, but here is what the driver is trying to achieve: The driver allocates a set of buffers for DMA. These buffers are mapped into user space, when the user does an mmap. In transmit, when the user space writes to these buffers, the data has to reach physical memory so that the device can access them. For receive, the cache has to be invalidated before the user space reads the buffer. Do let me know if further clarification is required. Any inputs and suggestions are welcome. BTW, please do send in the compiler error message. Regards, Vijay ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-07 8:40 ` Vijay Kumar @ 2008-11-07 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2008-11-11 6:58 ` Vijay Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2008-11-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vijay Kumar Cc: J.R. Mauro, Christoph Hellwig, Paul Mackerras, Greg KH, Stephen Rothwell, LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, jayakumar.lkml, sparclinux > May be the code is not doing what is supposed to do, but here is what the > driver is trying to achieve: > > The driver allocates a set of buffers for DMA. These buffers are mapped > into user space, when the user does an mmap. In transmit, when the user > space writes to these buffers, the data has to reach physical memory so > that the device can access them. For receive, the cache has to be > invalidated before the user space reads the buffer. > > Do let me know if further clarification is required. Any inputs and > suggestions are welcome. Well, this is the wrong API to do that. First, some platforms are cache coherent and thus don't need anything there other than maybe a barrier. Then, the dma_* API is what you want to ensure cache coherency with DMA transfers within the kernel. If userspace can directly trigger DMA from pre-allocated buffers, then doing an ioctl to sync is a major wastage, since most platforms are cache coherent (and thus don't need it) and those who are not generally provide user-space accessible ways of doing the flush to some extent (not all, for example, BookE PPC cannot invalidate the data cache from userspace, only flush it). In any case, we would need to understand better your driver userspace API and transfer model to find the right solution. Ben. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: sparc/staging compile error 2008-11-07 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2008-11-11 6:58 ` Vijay Kumar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Vijay Kumar @ 2008-11-11 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: benh Cc: J.R. Mauro, Christoph Hellwig, Paul Mackerras, Greg KH, Stephen Rothwell, LKML, David S. Miller, William L. Irwin, jayakumar.lkml, sparclinux Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > In any case, we would need to understand better your driver userspace > API and transfer model to find the right solution. Please find below the user space skeleton code, to access the driver. It was written by Robert Fitzsimons robfitz@273k.net The driver is based on this user space interface. In short, there is a ring buffer that is shared between the _device_ and _user-space_. The ring buffer has a header, that is shared between the _kernel_ and _user-space_. The header specifies the offsets of various buffers in the ring buffer. In Rx, after user space has read a buffer, the user space writes -1 to the offset in the header. When the device has filled the buffer, the kernel space writes the offset back to the header. #include <sys/mman.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <poll.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <unistd.h> #define G_USED -1 struct group_circular_buffer { int32_t group_size_bytes; int32_t group_count; int32_t group_offset[0]; }; int sysfs_write_long(const char *name, long value); int sysfs_read_long(const char *name, long *value); int sysfs_read_buffer(const char *name, void *buffer, int len); int process_group(void *group, int32_t group_size_bytes); int main(int argc, char **argv) { int uio_fd; int rx_fd; int group_index; long mmap_buffer_size; struct pollfd poll_fds; struct group_circular_buffer *ring; char buffer[128]; /* Query supported device and channels */ sysfs_read_buffer("/sys/.../uioX/name", buffer, sizeof(buffer)); sysfs_read_buffer("/sys/.../uioX/version", buffer, sizeof(buffer)); sysfs_read_buffer("/sys/.../uioX/channels", buffer, sizeof(buffer)); /* Open and mmap UIO device */ uio_fd = open("/dev/.../uioX", O_RDWR); // uio_mmap = mmap(..., uio_fd, ...); /* map BAR1 */ /* Configure 1 megabyte receive dma buffer */ sysfs_write_long("/sys/.../uioX/rx0/block_size", 512); sysfs_write_long("/sys/.../uioX/rx0/group_size", 1); sysfs_write_long("/sys/.../uioX/rx0/group_count", 256); // configure user firmware, uio_mmap /* Open rx char device, which allocates suitable dma/mmap buffers */ rx_fd = open("/dev/.../uioX/rx0", O_RDWR); /* Query size of mmap buffer, maybe use mmap for this value? */ sysfs_read_long("/sys/.../uioX/rx0/mmap_buffer_size", &mmap_buffer_size); ring = mmap(NULL, mmap_buffer_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, rx_fd, 0); // start/reset capture, uio_mmap group_index = 0; while (1) { if (ring->group_offset[group_index] > 0) { process_group(ring + ring->group_offset[group_index], ring->group_size_bytes); ring->group_offset[group_index] = G_USED; group_index = (group_index + 1) % ring->group_count; } else { poll_fds.fd = rx_fd; poll_fds.events = POLLIN | POLLERR; poll_fds.revents = 0; poll(&poll_fds, 1, -1); } } // stop capture, uio_mmap // munmap(ring) // munmap(uio_mmap) close(rx_fd); close(uio_fd); return 0; } int sysfs_write_long(const char *name, long value) { return 0; } int sysfs_read_long(const char *name, long *value) { return 0; } int sysfs_read_buffer(const char *name, void *buffer, int len) { return 0; } int process_group(void *group, int32_t group_size_bytes) { return 0; } Regards, Vijay ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-11 6:48 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-11-06 5:36 sparc/staging compile error Stephen Rothwell 2008-11-06 6:37 ` Greg KH 2008-11-06 6:39 ` David Miller 2008-11-06 10:32 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-11-06 14:06 ` J.R. Mauro 2008-11-06 17:32 ` Christoph Hellwig 2008-11-06 17:36 ` J.R. Mauro 2008-11-07 8:40 ` Vijay Kumar 2008-11-07 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2008-11-11 6:58 ` Vijay Kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox