Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description

Ingo Molnar
2008-12-03T20:43:25Z

* Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins.ml@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > Hi Ingo, Steven, Peter,
> > This series applies roughly to mainline as an enhancement to the sched_rt
> > logic. Peter and I were discussing some of the unecessary overhead in
> > pull_rt_tasks() via IRC, and this is my RFC attempt to address the problem.
> >
>
> Hi Ingo,
> I was putting together a refresh of this patch and I rebased on
> tip/sched/devel. I noticed that sched/devel is on 27-rc8, which is
> obviously a little stale. Is this the proper tree to send patches
> against, or would you prefer a different HEAD?

tip/master would be the base to use, or tip/sched/core. The sched/devel
branch is indeed stale.

Ingo