From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752438AbdIVRlA (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:41:00 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:58549 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752276AbdIVRk6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:40:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [media] spca500: Use common error handling code in spca500_synch310() To: Julia Lawall , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sakari Ailus , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <4921ea61-49cd-4071-e636-c199daddec8e@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:40:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QojKmfpTFMeWMGGIi4e6dMVtwutfejXuAJQODAx47cKKaztTHSX U9ZEITktnV7KqwfaohVdcjFJbW7dhm8wNwXkUHfX0y9sQM/xX/nuroHMi3uDVBKXef24WpU K7kW81EOaUP3MuCt5N7gAZKZfWTY7OetSMzet9wEdBvkJ3I/Puk/yGgNDLsVq6qNiaKbAzU ta084kA5EzR2n2PQNUoZQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:w6+53pcI1Bw=:wm5+4ingrPy+rmkntRq/ga 7Ps1vw+9jPHqD6WUa+Mjjy5QdAHQfaKyIzu6iyMno5TFN8S50RxnGWBqirNVlTSbjxs1vB1L2 fxKS9p6J8WzdMIkchGW6JJ3AXFfmPZW8XPPvqOYT1Hvkqrjg5zs+GJLd1voV2K/nTuTSOGv+w EFG3wKfXdi2EIWUoqtr1wA2hF9pfjfYfIul3lwo8v7JgAIK2lrpFIfWcsp3ZtxYH6sOz4TXjm v9kGaB+TW2zfpkSDUda2+QmA5D2h1C6ki/GJf7wKexol9qrEUhq1POBwDg0UD41CdVdhpiaW5 QXp+2CIWgyVSuEmMybOIftTYAOcGtTvhus/40xRxupZdYC63HrhGfmfQybQqzMGsdL8rtec/g IuU3URYw88gVNbHyz6bibC6WxCdvW4ZcspZI11bcMkhWbRipHI98qJYNAyGOrrlD8W04llG8i yWoqmw8EzgqwQeK6SrvTmzLPoRWZz4f/hD5eQ9smdyS4cfVr0na04wQ5RjP/HLlCNEo5jMIlx y+xDB2l8i7NEZfKbd1FKTr0rM6LO4UZp6oAULP3Xm4Yph955zy2TPno2AfvrnMVieXvVBFSmp kN+mlmR7umye/FW03kXfrvuYh7trTFcE/XY79rE+kFUd2fyPX4tlQPJxrBr2z6O6ChN1rbk4k F3rKYUJMHn/da/PLdGh+uaiqhoveN0cpFSPSymCkwXVObjA+7KQ7pbqQKhYJCctm8HWsSPkQL dbwdq54DQJeMAhq8f4RakumBFqbleBGDr0Y9cvFNWoGioOp6jylCBytELi7nXmezd4JNk5iCA 2+8xw9k9Ax+elxRJ58CLHO2lF/EjNqH405HyCmQTGxEIW/jfrU= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> return 0; >> -error: >> + >> +report_failure: >> + PERR("Set packet size: set interface error"); >> return -EBUSY; >> } > > Why change the label name? I find the suggested variant a bi better. > They are both equally uninformative. Which identifier would you find appropriate there? Regards, Markus