From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Make BUG() __noreturn.
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:48:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492748DA.3030805@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081121150023.032f7b5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
> Yup, this change will fix some compile warnings which will never be
> fixed in any other way for mips.
>
>> +static inline void __noreturn BUG(void)
>> +{
>> + __asm__ __volatile__("break %0" : : "i" (BRK_BUG));
>> + /* Fool GCC into thinking the function doesn't return. */
>> + while (1)
>> + ;
>> +}
>
> This kind of sucks, doesn't it? It adds instructions into the kernel
> text, very frequently on fast paths. Those instructions are never
> executed, and we're blowing away i-cache just to quash compiler
> warnings.
>
> For example, this:
>
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h~a
> +++ a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
> @@ -22,14 +22,12 @@ do { \
> ".popsection" \
> : : "i" (__FILE__), "i" (__LINE__), \
> "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry))); \
> - for (;;) ; \
> } while (0)
>
> #else
> #define BUG() \
> do { \
> asm volatile("ud2"); \
> - for (;;) ; \
> } while (0)
> #endif
>
> _
>
> reduces the size of i386 mm/vmalloc.o text by 56 bytes.
>
> I wonder if there is any clever way in which we can do this without
> introducing additional runtime cost.
As I said in the other part of the thread, We are working on a GCC patch
that adds a new built-in function '__builtin_noreturn()', that you could
substitute for 'for(;;);' that emits no instructions in this case.
David Daney
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-21 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 1:26 [PATCH] MIPS: Make BUG() __noreturn David Daney
2008-11-21 10:00 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-21 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-11-21 11:14 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-21 12:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-11-21 16:40 ` David Daney
2008-11-21 18:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-11-21 22:16 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-24 19:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-11-21 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-21 23:48 ` David Daney [this message]
2008-11-23 9:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-24 9:20 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-11-25 0:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-22 9:39 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492748DA.3030805@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox