From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757118AbYKUXuK (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:50:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753651AbYKUXt5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:49:57 -0500 Received: from mail3.caviumnetworks.com ([12.108.191.235]:17151 "EHLO mail3.caviumnetworks.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753568AbYKUXt5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:49:57 -0500 Message-ID: <492748DA.3030805@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:48:42 -0800 From: David Daney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Make BUG() __noreturn. References: <49260E4C.8080500@caviumnetworks.com> <20081121150023.032f7b5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20081121150023.032f7b5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 23:48:42.0736 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF72F700:01C94C33] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Yup, this change will fix some compile warnings which will never be > fixed in any other way for mips. > >> +static inline void __noreturn BUG(void) >> +{ >> + __asm__ __volatile__("break %0" : : "i" (BRK_BUG)); >> + /* Fool GCC into thinking the function doesn't return. */ >> + while (1) >> + ; >> +} > > This kind of sucks, doesn't it? It adds instructions into the kernel > text, very frequently on fast paths. Those instructions are never > executed, and we're blowing away i-cache just to quash compiler > warnings. > > For example, this: > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h~a > +++ a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h > @@ -22,14 +22,12 @@ do { \ > ".popsection" \ > : : "i" (__FILE__), "i" (__LINE__), \ > "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry))); \ > - for (;;) ; \ > } while (0) > > #else > #define BUG() \ > do { \ > asm volatile("ud2"); \ > - for (;;) ; \ > } while (0) > #endif > > _ > > reduces the size of i386 mm/vmalloc.o text by 56 bytes. > > I wonder if there is any clever way in which we can do this without > introducing additional runtime cost. As I said in the other part of the thread, We are working on a GCC patch that adds a new built-in function '__builtin_noreturn()', that you could substitute for 'for(;;);' that emits no instructions in this case. David Daney