From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756117AbYLEQd1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:33:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752309AbYLEQdU (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:33:20 -0500 Received: from aux-209-217-49-36.oklahoma.net ([209.217.49.36]:3758 "EHLO proteus.paralogos.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751845AbYLEQdT (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:33:19 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 577 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:33:19 EST Message-ID: <4939557F.1000609@paralogos.com> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:23:27 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kissell" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: Nick Andrew , Jonathan Corbet , Lucas Woods , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c References: <20081205155654.GA2765@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20081205155654.GA2765@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:36:54AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote: > >> From: Nick Andrew >> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:36:54 +1100 >> To: Jonathan Corbet , "Kevin D. Kissell" , >> Lucas Woods , Nick Andrew , >> Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org >> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List >> Subject: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c >> >> Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c >> >> From: Nick Andrew >> >> It should be 'lose', not 'loose'. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew >> > > Thanks, applied. Note that the address you used for Kevin Kissel to post > your patch is no longer valid. > Yeah, but I'm still on the mailing list, so I saw it. I don't "own" that particular module, but for whatever it's worth, I'm OK with fixing the comment - though I'm surprised that checkpatch let a non-canonical multi-line comment block like that go by. ;o) Regards, Kevin K.