public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hrtimer: removing all ur callback modes
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 12:22:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <493BB1EB.5000004@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228385830.5092.43.camel@twins>

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 12:43 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an attempt at removing some of the hrtimer complexity by
>> reducing the number of callback modes to 1.
>>
>> This means that all hrtimer callback functions will be ran from HARD-irq
>> context.
>>
>> I went through all the 30 odd hrtimer callback functions in the kernel
>> and saw only one that I'm not quite sure of, which is the one in
>> net/can/bcm.c - hence I'm CC-ing the folks responsible for that code.
>>     

Thanks Peter.

Indeed i assumed my hrtimer callbacks to run in soft-irq. I tried the 
can-bcm protocol with Ingos current linux-2.6-sched-devel.git including 
your patches and i did not see any issues so far. And i do not expect 
any (recursion) problems with hrtimer_forward() in my code either.

But i'm not that familiar with the timer context's stuff, that i would 
like guaranty that the functions i use in bcm_send_user() and in 
bcm_can_tx() are always safe to be used in hard-irq context.

It would be nice, if you could give me some support by double checking 
the correctness of the hard-irq context in the given functions.

Best regards,
Oliver


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-07 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-25 11:43 [RFC PATCH] hrtimer: removing all ur callback modes Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-25 14:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 15:03   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-04 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-04 10:33   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-07 11:22   ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2008-12-07 12:59     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-08 10:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 11:00         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-08 15:25           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-09 13:32             ` Takashi Iwai
2008-12-09  8:07         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-09  8:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-09 10:59             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 22:46               ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-31  8:32                 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-08 16:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 16:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 16:18     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=493BB1EB.5000004@hartkopp.net \
    --to=oliver@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox