From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@codefidence.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@skynet.be>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: use stack allocation for struct usb_ctrlrequest
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:31:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493FD2D1.8040904@codefidence.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081210142301.GA11490@localhost>
Wu Fengguang wrote:
>
>>> e.g. what if the memory is allocated from ZONE_HIGHMEM?
>>>
>>>
>> In many cases there is no problem to DMA high memory. If you happen to
>> be working with a device that does have problems with full 32 bit
>> addresses then GFP_DMA would be the right flag, not GFP_NOIO.
>>
>
> For 64bit systems, we can easily go beyond 4GB physical memory.
> So at least we should add GFP_DMA32 in addition to GFP_NOIO?
>
>
I don't think so. 64bit systems don't have ZONE_HIMEM - this is why I
was referring to 32 bit.
More to the point, many devices don't have any issues accessing full 64
bit addressing mode and many 64bit machines have IOMMU that will take
care of those devices that DO have a problem. Adding this flag will just
penalize the MM sub-system for no reason. For the rare case where there
is a device that cannot do 64 bit addressing in a 64 bit machine with no
IOMMU, AFAIK bounce buffers are used to overcome the issue.
Cheers,
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
Codefidence Ltd.
The code is free, your time isn't.(TM)
Web: http://codefidence.com
Email: gilad@codefidence.com
Office: +972-8-9316883 ext. 201
Fax: +972-8-9316885
Mobile: +972-52-8260388
The Doctor: Don't worry, Reinette, just a nightmare.
Everyone has nightmares. Even monsters from under the
bed have nightmares, don't you, monster?
Reinette: What do monsters have nightmares about?
The Doctor: Me!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-10 7:32 [PATCH] USB: use stack allocation for struct usb_ctrlrequest Wu Fengguang
2008-12-10 9:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-12-10 12:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2008-12-10 14:07 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2008-12-10 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2008-12-10 14:31 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef [this message]
2008-12-11 0:01 ` Pete Zaitcev
2008-12-11 0:57 ` Robert Hancock
2008-12-11 0:59 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493FD2D1.8040904@codefidence.com \
--to=gilad@codefidence.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@skynet.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox