From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Yaroslav <iam@0la.ch>, "Yaroslav Bolyukin" <iam@lach.pw>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
"Leo Li" <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
"Rodrigo Siqueira" <siqueira@igalia.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Wayne Lin" <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/edid: prepare for VESA vendor-specific data block extension
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:29:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493bcd10bdfc8a3123323b77eead3dacadc08e3c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41fbf5af-559a-4810-82c1-5c2e8a497e5b@0la.ch>
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Yaroslav <iam@0la.ch> wrote:
> On 2025-11-26 10:13, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2025, Yaroslav Bolyukin <iam@lach.pw> wrote:
>>> Current VESA vendor-specific block parsing expects real block size to be
>>> the same as the defined struct size, use real offsets in conditionals
>>> instead to add struct fields in future commits.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yaroslav Bolyukin <iam@lach.pw>
>>
>> I think this is something we want to backport, since MSO would break
>> with bigger vendor-specific blocks, and that leads to black screens on
>> MSO displays.
>>
>
> Not sure why would we want to backport that if we don't backport the
> other changes, old kernels will just have the broken implementation,
> which in reality affects almost no body, given that there were no bug
> reports
The failure mode is: Someone buys a new shiny laptop with eDP MSO, with
bigger vendor block, and won't get a picture on screen.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 6:51 [PATCH v6 0/7] VESA DisplayID spec allows the device to force its DSC bits per pixel value Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] drm/edid: rename VESA block parsing functions to more generic name Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 9:05 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] drm/edid: prepare for VESA vendor-specific data block extension Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 9:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:50 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:59 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 15:06 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 15:26 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 16:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:20 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:29 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-11-26 14:41 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:47 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:53 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] drm/edid: MSO should only be used for non-eDP displays Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:10 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:22 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] drm/edid: parse DSC DPP passthru support flag for mode VII timings Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 14:35 ` Yaroslav
2025-11-26 14:52 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] drm/edid: for consistency, use mask everywhere for block rev parsing Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:20 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] drm/edid: parse DRM VESA dsc bpp target Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 14:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-11-26 6:51 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] drm/amd: use fixed dsc bits-per-pixel from edid Yaroslav Bolyukin
2025-11-26 7:13 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] VESA DisplayID spec allows the device to force its DSC bits per pixel value Yaroslav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493bcd10bdfc8a3123323b77eead3dacadc08e3c@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Wayne.Lin@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=iam@0la.ch \
--cc=iam@lach.pw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=siqueira@igalia.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox