Re: [PATCH][RFC 2/23]: SCST core

Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-12-13T14:47:18Z

Steven Rostedt wrote:
> (Added Ingo and Frederic)
>
> On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 22:24 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>>>> drivers/scst/scst_lib.c | 3689
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> drivers/scst/scst_main.c | 1919 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> drivers/scst/scst_module.c | 69
>>>>>> drivers/scst/scst_priv.h | 513 +++++
>>>>>> drivers/scst/scst_targ.c | 5458
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>> 8 files changed, 12435 insertions(+)
>>>>> There was a lot af TRACE_ENTRY() / TRACE_EXIT() noise.
>>>>> We should have proper tools for that by now (I hope).
>>>> Sorry, I don't see such tools with, for instance, a possibility to be
>>>> compiled out in non-debug builds.
>>>>
>>>> From one side, I can agree, those TRACE_ENTRY()/TRACE_EXIT() statements
>>>> *may* look like a noise (I personally don't notice them), but, from
>>>> other side, in past times they have proved how usable they are. If an
>>>> SCST user has a problem, I simply ask him to make a debug build, then
>>>> enable entry_exit and some other logging levels, then reproduce the
>>>> problem and send me the logs. Then in most cases I can see what's wrong
>>>> and provide a fix without additional actions and questions.
>>> I had ftrace in mind but it has not hit mainline yet.
>
> I'm assuming you are talking about previous kernels. ftrace is in
> 2.6.27, and dynamic ftrace is back in 2.6.28-rcX
>
>>> But will do before this patchset does.
>> Unfortunately, ftrace at the moment can't fully replace
>> TRACE_ENTRY()/TRACE_EXIT() statements, because it lacks:
>>
>> 1. Doing trace in only some modules or source files. Noise from tracing
>> of the whole kernel is not needed if we investigate problem in only one
>> module (SCST in this case)
>
> With dynamic ftrace you can pick and choose the what functions you want
> to trace. 2.6.28 will not have the exit tracing, but 2.6.29 will (see
> linux-tip for latest ftrace)
>
> Here, for current 2.6.28, I can do:
>
> # awk '$2=="t" && $4=="[e1000]" { print $3; }' \
> /proc/kallsyms > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
>
> and now only the e1000 functions will be traced.
>
> # echo function > /debug/tracing/current_tracer
>
> [root@bxrhel51 ~]# cat /debug/tracing/trace |head
> # tracer: function
> #
> # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | | |
> sshd-3411 [000] 567.748887: e1000_xmit_frame <-dev_hard_start_xmit
> sshd-3411 [000] 567.748890: e1000_maybe_stop_tx <-e1000_xmit_frame
> sshd-3411 [000] 567.748893: e1000_maybe_stop_tx <-e1000_xmit_frame
> <idle>-0 [000] 567.748943: e1000_intr <-handle_IRQ_event
> <idle>-0 [000] 567.748948: e1000_clean <-net_rx_action
> <idle>-0 [000] 567.748949: e1000_unmap_and_free_tx_resource <-e1000_clean
>
>
> I can pick any function I want to trace. The list of available functions
> to trace is in /debug/tracing/available_filter_functions.
>
>
>> .
>>
>> 2. Ability to inject own messages in the output stream. It's needed to
>> have synchronized stream of output messages about both functions tracing
>> and what those functions doing. For instance:
>>
>> entry in func1()
>> adding cmd C to list L
>> exit from func1()
>
> Is this from within the driver?
>
> By adding this simply patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index 872799b..b198dac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> #include "e1000.h"
> #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
>
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> +
> char e1000_driver_name[] = "e1000";
> static char e1000_driver_string[] = "Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver";
> #define DRV_VERSION "7.3.20-k3-NAPI"
> @@ -3810,6 +3812,8 @@ static int e1000_clean(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> if (tx_cleaned)
> work_done = budget;
>
> + ftrace_printk("adapter is %p work_done: %d\n", adapter, work_done);
> +
> /* If budget not fully consumed, exit the polling mode */
> if (work_done < budget) {
> if (likely(adapter->itr_setting & 3))
>
>
> I could do:
>
> # awk '$2=="t" && $4=="[e1000]" { print $3; }' \
> /proc/kallsyms > /debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
> # echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled
> # echo ftrace_printk > /debug/tracing/iter_ctrl
> # echo function > /debug/tracing/current_tracer
> # echo 1 > /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled
> [wait]
> # echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled
> # cat /debug/tracing/trace | head
> # tracer: function
> #
> # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | | |
> bash-3393 [000] 469.809904: e1000_clean_rx_irq <-e1000_clean
> bash-3393 [000] 469.809939: e1000_alloc_rx_buffers <-e1000_clean_rx_irq
> bash-3393 [000] 469.809940: e1000_check_64k_bound <-e1000_alloc_rx_buffers
> bash-3393 [000] 469.809945: e1000_clean: adapter is ffff88003d13a900 work_done: 64
> bash-3393 [000] 469.809946: e1000_clean <-net_rx_action
>
>
>
> Note in 2.6.29 (and current tip): s/iter_ctrl/tracing_options/
>
>
>
>> Otherwise there would be 2 traces:
>>
>> entry in func1()
>> exit from func1()
>>
>> and
>>
>> adding cmd C to list L
>>
>> which almost impossible to merge to analyze.
>
> Perhaps you need to do it from userspace?
>
> # echo 1 > /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled ; \
> echo hi > /debug/tracing/trace_marker ; \
> sleep 1 ; \
> echo bye > /debug/tracing/trace_marker ; \
> echo 0 > /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled
> # cat /debug/tracing/trace
> # tracer: function
> #
> # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | | |
> bash-3393 [003] 1068.636510: 0: hi
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.039891: e1000_intr <-handle_IRQ_event
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.039898: e1000_clean <-net_rx_action
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.039901: e1000_clean_rx_irq <-e1000_clean
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.039950: e1000_alloc_rx_buffers <-e1000_clean_rx_irq
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.039951: e1000_check_64k_bound <-e1000_alloc_rx_buffers
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.039952: e1000_update_itr <-e1000_clean
> [...]
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.487184: e1000_intr <-handle_IRQ_event
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.487190: e1000_clean <-net_rx_action
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.487191: e1000_clean_rx_irq <-e1000_clean
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.487192: e1000_update_itr <-e1000_clean
> <idle>-0 [002] 1069.487192: e1000_update_itr <-e1000_clean
> bash-3393 [003] 1069.638193: 0: bye
>

All the above functionality is almost what we need. The only thing left,
which I forgot to mention, is possibility to log also functions return
value on exit. This is what TRACE_EXIT_RES() in SCST does. Is it
possible to add those?

Also (maybe I simply miss something) looks like ftrace doesn't trace
exit from functions, only entrance to them. Is it true? Is it possibly
to log exit from functions as well?

And one more question. Is it possible to redirect ftrace tracing to
serial console or any other console (netconsole?)? It can be helpful to
investigate hard lockups in IRQ or with IRQs disabled.

Thanks!
Vlad