public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thanos Makatos <mcatos@ics.forth.gr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Inexplicable I/O latency using worker threads
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:39:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4942314E.80408@ics.forth.gr> (raw)

Hello all.

I am facing a weird problem with a virtual block driver I made concerning excessive I/O latency.

My block driver intercepts requests and redirects them to a real block device,
but not just be setting the bio->bi_bdev field, I create new bios.

Anyway, my problem is that for load balancing reasons I need per-CPU worker threads
where I enqueue requests and let them do all the work. If I use 2 threads in a round
robin manner (request 1 served by CPU 0, 2 by CPU1, 3 by CPU0 and so on), performance
is inexplicably low.

If I choose only one CPU to act as a worker the problem is gone. The difference of measured
I/O latency is more than 30 times.

What could be happening?

I'm using a vanilla 2.6.18.8.

Thanx in advance.

             reply	other threads:[~2008-12-12 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-12  9:39 Thanos Makatos [this message]
2008-12-12 17:46 ` Inexplicable I/O latency using worker threads Chris Snook
2008-12-13 12:44   ` Thanos McAtos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4942314E.80408@ics.forth.gr \
    --to=mcatos@ics.forth.gr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox