From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: use maxcpus=NUM to extend the cpu limit as well as restrict the limit
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:38:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4942857A.8050909@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812122211.36590.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 21:58:09 Mike Travis wrote:
>> Impact: allow adding additional cpus.
>>
>> Use maxcpus=NUM kernel parameter to extend the number of possible cpus as well
>> as (currently) limit them. Any cpus >= number of present cpus will disabled.
> ...
>
> These two bits of logic are very similar: can we merge them?
>
...
Since there's already precedence for "possible_cpus=XXX" might that be a better
alternative? In which case maxcpus does not need to change at all.
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-12 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-11 11:28 [PATCH 0/4] cpumask: fixups and additions Mike Travis
2008-12-11 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: fix assign_irq_vector boot up problem Mike Travis
2008-12-12 8:27 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-12 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-12 18:10 ` Mike Travis
2008-12-12 19:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-12-11 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: fix cpu_mask_to_apicid_and to include cpu_online_mask Mike Travis
2008-12-12 11:06 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-12 16:37 ` Mike Travis
2008-12-13 12:03 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-11 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: use maxcpus=NUM to extend the cpu limit as well as restrict the limit Mike Travis
2008-12-11 13:41 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-12-11 18:19 ` Mike Travis
2008-12-12 10:03 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-12-12 11:41 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-12 15:38 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-12-11 11:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpumask: add sysfs displays for configured and disabled cpu maps Mike Travis
2008-12-12 11:44 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4942857A.8050909@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox