public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <Matthew.Dodd@sparta.com>
To: "David P. Quigley" <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	hch@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
	trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, bfields@fieldses.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set,notify}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information.
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:50:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4942DCA5.60109@sparta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228490712.15920.45.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil>

David P. Quigley wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:58 +1100, James Morris wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, David P. Quigley wrote:
>>
>>> + * @inode_getsecctx:
>>> + * 	Returns a string containing all relavent security context information
>>> + *
>>> + * 	@inode we wish to set the security context of.
>>> + *	@ctx is a pointer in which to place the allocated security context.
>>> + *	@ctxlen points to the place to put the length of @ctx.
>>>   * This is the main security structure.
>>>   */
>>>  struct security_operations {
>>> @@ -1479,6 +1514,10 @@ struct security_operations {
>>>  	int (*secctx_to_secid) (const char *secdata, u32 seclen, u32 *secid);
>>>  	void (*release_secctx) (char *secdata, u32 seclen);
>>>  
>>> +	int (*inode_notifysecctx)(struct inode *inode, void *ctx, u32 ctxlen);
>>> +	int (*inode_setsecctx)(struct dentry *dentry, void *ctx, u32 ctxlen);
>>> +	int (*inode_getsecctx)(struct inode *inode, void **ctx, u32 *ctxlen);
>> For inode_getsecctx(), you're returning the length via the return value, 
>> so you should not also need to pass in a pointer to ctxlen, right?
>>
>> IMHO, it's clearer and simpler to always only return error status from 
>> these kinds of functions, and to pass things like size back via pointer 
>> args, although it seems that a few mixed return functions have crept in to 
>> the code over time.  My preference would be to convert it to return value 
>> is error status only, with the length entirely separate as a pointer arg.
>>
>>
>> - James
> 
> I'll have to look into why we did it this way. The discussion for these
> patches happened many months ago so I don't remember why it was done
> this way. I remember at the time getting an approval for the approach
> but a desire not to merge the patch while there were no users of it.

I think it was a result of inode_getsecctx() being a wrapper for 
selinux_inode_getsecurity() which returns a length.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-12 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-26 21:03 [Labeled-nfs] [RFC v4] Security Label Support for NFSv4 David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 01/14] patch fix_use_before_init_in_nfsd4_list_rec_dir David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 02/14] VFS: Factor out part of vfs_setxattr so it can be called from the SELinux hook for inode_setsecctx David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 03/14] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set,notify}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information David P. Quigley
2008-12-05  9:58   ` James Morris
2008-12-05 15:25     ` David P. Quigley
2008-12-05 17:32       ` David P. Quigley
2008-12-12 21:50       ` Matthew N. Dodd [this message]
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 04/14] Security: Add hook to calculate context based on a negative dentry David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 05/14] Security: Add Hook to test if the particular xattr is part of a MAC model David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 06/14] SELinux: Add new labeling type native labels David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 07/14] KConfig: Add KConfig entries for Labeled NFS David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 08/14] NFSv4: Add label recommended attribute and NFSv4 flags David P. Quigley
2008-12-05  2:38   ` James Morris
2009-04-03  8:31   ` James Morris
2009-04-03  9:59     ` David P. Quigley
2009-04-03 11:43       ` James Morris
2009-04-03 12:23         ` David P. Quigley
2009-04-05 23:33           ` James Morris
2009-04-03 11:29     ` David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 09/14] NFS: Add security_label text mount option and handling code to NFS David P. Quigley
2008-12-05  4:47   ` James Morris
2008-12-12 21:43     ` [Labeled-nfs] " Matthew N. Dodd
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 10/14] NFS: Introduce lifecycle management for label attribute David P. Quigley
2008-12-05  5:45   ` James Morris
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 11/14] NFSv4: Introduce new label structure David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 12/14] NFS: Client implementation of Labeled-NFS David P. Quigley
2008-12-05  9:39   ` James Morris
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 13/14] NFS: Extend NFS xattr handlers to accept the security namespace David P. Quigley
2008-11-26 21:03 ` [PATCH 14/14] NFSD: Server implementation of MAC Labeling David P. Quigley
2008-12-05 10:00   ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4942DCA5.60109@sparta.com \
    --to=matthew.dodd@sparta.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=labeled-nfs@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox