public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Edmon <harry@atmos.washington.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Max Kellermann <max@duempel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: High load in 2.6.27, NFS / rpcauth_lookup_credcache()?
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:44:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4946EBFA.60700@atmos.washington.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224773745.7625.4.camel@localhost>

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 14:36 +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
>   
>> On 2008/10/22 11:12, Max Kellermann <max@duempel.org> wrote:
>>     
>>> after I was able to fix http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/17/147, the
>>> server which was already upgraded to 2.6.27.2 still gets very high
>>> load.  It is a web server with NFS file storage (NetApp), and while
>>> the others in the cluster (kernel 2.6.25) have a load of 1-3, 2.6.27.2
>>> gets 30-50.
>>>
>>> I did an oprofile, with the following results (server just started,
>>> load "only" 5-10):
>>>
>>> 87593    56.1116  (no location information)   vmlinux
>>> vmlinux                  rpcauth_lookup_credcache
>>> 16037    10.2732  auth_generic.c:0            vmlinux
>>> vmlinux                  generic_match
>>> 6460      4.1382  (no location information)   php4
>>> php4                     (no symbols)
>>> 2478      1.5874  (no location information)   libc-2.7.so
>>> libc-2.7.so              (no symbols)
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> We havn't configured any special authentication method.  It is a NFSv3
>>> over UDP mount, but the kernel has NFSv4 and therefore KRB5 enabled.
>>>
>>> Any ideas why rpcauth_lookup_credcache() goes overboard with CPU
>>> usage?
>>>       
>> I have bisected the problem: 98a8e323 is the result ("SUNRPC: Add a
>> helper rpcauth_lookup_generic_cred()").  5c691044 is ok.
>>
>> See the attached oprofile annotation data for both commits.  I guess
>> that the function rpcauth_lookup_credcache() is waiting for a spinlock
>> too often and too long.  Trond, any idea?
>>     
>
> Can you add a '-v' to the rpc.gssd daemon startup line? I'd like to see
> how often you are creating new gss contexts.
>
>   
>> Harry: added you to Cc because your problem sounds similar.
>>     
>
> Harry's problem is should be unrelated. afaik, he is seeing a problem
> with userland RPC code, not kernel rpc code.
>
> Trond
>
>   
I am finally getting some time to look at my problem that I originally 
reported in October (SUNRPC problem with 2.6.26 and beyond), and I am 
seeing the same behavior as Max Kellermann when my machine slows as I 
described earlier.  The system in question is currently running 
2.6.27.7.  Here is what I see when it is misbehaving:

samples  %        image name               app name                 
symbol name
11380517 57.4191  sunrpc.ko                sunrpc                   
rpcauth_lookup_credcache
3263657  16.4664  sunrpc.ko                sunrpc                   
generic_match
1081287   5.4555  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
copy_user_generic_string
499407    2.5197  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
__posix_lock_file
[...]

And here is what I see when I stop the programs that are chewing up all 
the system time, and then starting them up again:

samples  %        image name               app name                 
symbol name
6372650  21.7978  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
copy_user_generic_string
5401386  18.4755  sunrpc.ko                sunrpc                   
rpcauth_lookup_credcache
3018753  10.3257  vmlinux                  vmlinux                  
__posix_lock_file
1050095   3.5919  sunrpc.ko                sunrpc                   
generic_match


and I am not using Kerberos with NFSv4 (i.e. no rpc.gssd).  Did you ever 
find a solution for this problem with rpcauth_lookup_credcache?

-- 

 Dr. Harry Edmon			E-MAIL: harry@atmos.washington.edu
 206-543-0547				harry@washington.edu
 Dept of Atmospheric Sciences		FAX:	206-543-0308
 University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, WA 98195-1640


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-15 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-22  9:12 High load in 2.6.27, NFS / rpcauth_lookup_credcache()? Max Kellermann
2008-10-22 17:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-10-23 12:36 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-23 14:55   ` Trond Myklebust
2008-10-24  8:39     ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-24 18:09       ` Trond Myklebust
2008-10-27  9:58         ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-27 15:48           ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-17 12:35             ` Max Kellermann
2008-11-19 22:31               ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-20 14:08                 ` Max Kellermann
2008-12-15 23:44     ` Harry Edmon [this message]
2008-12-16 13:02       ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-16 21:21         ` Willy Tarreau
2008-12-16 23:21           ` [stable] " Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4946EBFA.60700@atmos.washington.edu \
    --to=harry@atmos.washington.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=max@duempel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox