From: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gcosta@redhat.com,
Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:27:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49491A50.7000109@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228090719.7112.13.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> We want to ensure that connected sockets close down the connection when we
> set XPT_CLOSE, so that we don't keep it hanging while cleaning up all the
> stuff that is keeping a reference to the socket.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> ---
>
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 95293f5..a1b048d 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static void svc_udp_data_ready(struct sock *, int);
> static int svc_udp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *);
> static int svc_udp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *);
> static void svc_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *);
> +static void svc_tcp_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *);
> static void svc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *);
>
> static struct svc_xprt *svc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int,
> @@ -1017,7 +1018,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_ops = {
> .xpo_recvfrom = svc_tcp_recvfrom,
> .xpo_sendto = svc_tcp_sendto,
> .xpo_release_rqst = svc_release_skb,
> - .xpo_detach = svc_sock_detach,
> + .xpo_detach = svc_tcp_sock_detach,
> .xpo_free = svc_sock_free,
> .xpo_prep_reply_hdr = svc_tcp_prep_reply_hdr,
> .xpo_has_wspace = svc_tcp_has_wspace,
> @@ -1282,6 +1283,24 @@ static void svc_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> sk->sk_state_change = svsk->sk_ostate;
> sk->sk_data_ready = svsk->sk_odata;
> sk->sk_write_space = svsk->sk_owspace;
> +
> + if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep))
> + wake_up_interruptible(sk->sk_sleep);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Disconnect the socket, and reset the callbacks
> + */
> +static void svc_tcp_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> +{
> + struct svc_sock *svsk = container_of(xprt, struct svc_sock, sk_xprt);
> +
> + dprintk("svc: svc_tcp_sock_detach(%p)\n", svsk);
> +
> + svc_sock_detach(xprt);
> +
> + if (!test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags))
> + kernel_sock_shutdown(svsk->sk_sock, SHUT_RDWR);
How is this different than what happens as an artifact of sock_release?
> }
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 12:32 [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Max Kellermann
2008-10-17 14:33 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-20 6:51 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 7:43 ` Ian Campbell
2008-10-20 13:15 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-20 14:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 14:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-20 14:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-05-22 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-25 13:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 6:27 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 11:45 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 13:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-02 14:40 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-07 2:12 ` kenneth johansson
2008-11-04 19:10 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 7:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 13:38 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 14:04 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-26 22:12 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-01 0:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:27 ` Tom Tucker [this message]
2008-12-17 18:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 18:59 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: We only need to call svc_delete_xprt() once Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: svc_xprt_enqueue should not refuse to enqueue 'XPT_DEAD' transports Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:35 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-17 19:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-23 14:49 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-23 23:39 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 15:22 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 15:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 16:26 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 18:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 22:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-06 12:16 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-14 18:24 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-16 17:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-16 18:39 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-07 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 18:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 21:22 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-08 21:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-12 9:46 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 8:27 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 16:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49491A50.7000109@opengridcomputing.com \
--to=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mk@cm4all.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox