public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Jain <me@ankitjain.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, joel.becker@oracle.com,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:31:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494ABA11.2050205@ankitjain.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081217202815.GE8791@wotan.suse.de>

Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:34:24PM +0530, Ankit Jain wrote:
>> 2. Should the corresponding ioctls be removed from ocfs2?
> 
> Well, a small amount of the code in fs/ocfs2/ioctl.c can certainly go away.
> Shouldn't we be talking about doing the same for xfs too?

Reading the code a bit, my understanding is that as compat_ioctl is also
supported and that just delegates to ioctl (ocfs2_ioctl), so we can't
remove the *_RESVSP* handling.
Same goes for xfs also.

Does that sound fair or did I not understand it correctly?

-Ankit

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-18 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-15  8:04 [PATCH][RFC] fs: Add new pre-allocation ioctls to vfs for compatibility with legacy xfs ioctls Ankit Jain
2008-12-17 20:28 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-12-17 21:06   ` [xfs-masters] " Eric Sandeen
2008-12-17 21:15     ` Mark Fasheh
2008-12-18  9:50       ` Ankit Jain
2008-12-18  9:44   ` Ankit Jain
2008-12-18 21:01   ` Ankit Jain [this message]
2008-12-18  6:49 ` Felix Blyakher
2008-12-18  9:54   ` Ankit Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=494ABA11.2050205@ankitjain.org \
    --to=me@ankitjain.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox