From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/13] fs/xfs: Remove redundant test
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 10:01:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <494E6846.8070800@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812211640360.9555@pc-004.diku.dk>
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> In fs/cifs/cifssmb.c, pLockData is tested for being NULL at the beginning
> of the function, and not reassigned subsequently.
>
> In fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, bp is tested for being NULL just a few lines
> above.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r exists@
> local idexpression x;
> expression E;
> position p1,p2;
> @@
>
> if (x@p1 == NULL || ...) { ... when forall
> return ...; }
> ... when != \(x=E\|x--\|x++\|--x\|++x\|x-=E\|x+=E\|x|=E\|x&=E\|&x\)
> (
> x@p2 == NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> // another path to the test that is not through p1?
> @s exists@
> local idexpression r.x;
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> @@
>
> ... when != x@p1
> (
> x@p2 == NULL
> |
> x@p2 != NULL
> )
>
> @fix depends on !s@
> position r.p1,r.p2;
> expression x,E;
> statement S1,S2;
> @@
>
> (
> - if ((x@p2 != NULL) || ...)
> S1
> |
> - if ((x@p2 == NULL) && ...) S1
> |
> - BUG_ON(x@p2 == NULL);
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Looks fine to me, though a similar test under the #ifdef DEBUG can
probably also be removed.
-Eric
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> index 8ee2f8c..22afe29 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ xfs_trans_read_buf(
> return (flags & XFS_BUF_TRYLOCK) ?
> EAGAIN : XFS_ERROR(ENOMEM);
>
> - if ((bp != NULL) && (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0)) {
> + if (XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp) != 0) {
> xfs_ioerror_alert("xfs_trans_read_buf", mp,
> bp, blkno);
> error = XFS_BUF_GETERROR(bp);
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-21 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-21 15:40 [PATCH 9/13] fs/xfs: Remove redundant test Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-12-21 16:36 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:38 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:45 ` Julia Lawall
2008-12-21 16:47 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=494E6846.8070800@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox