From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Cc: oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:42:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49544497.9020900@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229894585.6898.6.camel@thinkpad>
Tim Blechmann wrote:
>> i am experiencing an issue, similar to the one reported in
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/30/319.
>
> bisecting showed, that commit b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> (oprofile: Implement Intel architectural perfmon support) caused the
> problem.
> oddly, the newly introduced api is not used, since the model struct is
> set during the ppro_init call ...
We're still investigating the problem. Thanks for the report.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-21 14:23 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression Tim Blechmann
2008-12-21 21:23 ` Tim Blechmann
2008-12-22 12:11 ` Robert Richter
2008-12-26 2:42 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-01-02 11:04 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-14 17:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-14 18:19 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-15 8:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-15 9:14 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-15 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-16 0:53 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-16 8:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-16 11:29 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-16 15:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-16 16:02 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-17 13:32 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-17 14:14 ` Robert Richter
2009-01-17 15:09 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-17 15:56 ` Robert Richter
2009-01-17 16:40 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-02-11 19:51 ` 2.6.29-rc4 regression (was: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression) Tim Blechmann
2009-02-13 19:07 ` Robert Richter
2009-02-16 10:23 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-02-16 11:33 ` Robert Richter
2009-02-16 12:53 ` 2.6.29-rc4 regression Tim Blechmann
2009-02-17 7:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-17 21:56 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-02-18 4:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-16 11:40 ` 2.6.29-rc4 regression (was: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression) Robert Richter
2009-02-19 16:34 ` [PATCH] oprofile: don't set counter width from cpuid on core2 Tim Blechmann
2009-03-03 10:04 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-03 11:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 11:09 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: oprofile: don't set counter width from cpuid on Core2 Tim Blechmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-22 14:55 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression Tim Blechmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49544497.9020900@linux.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=tim@klingt.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox