From: Andreas Sundstrom <sunkan@zappa.cx>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28 ext4, xen and lvm volume becomes ro after snapshot
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:48:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495526F6.9040704@zappa.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081226182145.GP9871@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso wrote:
> Hmm... ok, to summarize, you are seeing this problem with 2.6.28 (have
> you tried earlier kernel versions) when an LVM volume has a read/only
> snapshot in existence and you try to mount the LVM volume using ext4.
> If you mount the same LVM volume using ext3, you don't see any
> problems. Is that correct?
>
Correct, and I have not been using barriers with any earlier kernel.
I stumbled upon this because barriers are enabled by default in ext4.
> Can you try mounting ext3 with barriers enabled? Booting with the
> command linux option rootflags=barriers should do the trick. If that
> fails, then it would indicate that trying to enable barriers in a Xen
> guest while the host OS has created a snapshot of volume causes an I/O
> error, thus leading errors which you are seeing.
>
> - Ted
>
Yes, I mounted it with ext3 and barrier=1 and could reproduce the problem.
ext3 did not remount the fs ro though, it seems to only disable barriers:
[ 7.681759] blkfront: xvda1: write barrier op failed
[ 7.681776] blkfront: xvda1: barriers disabled
[ 7.681785] end_request: I/O error, dev xvda1, sector 4584
[ 7.681800] end_request: I/O error, dev xvda1, sector 4584
[ 7.681886] JBD: barrier-based sync failed on xvda1 - disabling barriers
And then I tested with ext4 and barrier=0 and that also works.
I don't know if this is expected behaviour or not or if it's worth
looking into.
I just wanted to report back what I saw. For me personally it's no issue.
I'll be using ext4 without barriers for a while and see how it goes.
But I'm here if you want something tested or a patch verified or anything,
but I guess this might be a Xen issue rather than vanilla kernel stuff.
Thanks for helping out with the narrowing down of the issue
/Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-26 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 11:06 2.6.28 ext4, xen and lvm volume becomes ro after snapshot Andreas Sundstrom
2008-12-26 14:07 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-26 15:42 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2008-12-26 18:21 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-26 18:48 ` Andreas Sundstrom [this message]
2008-12-26 19:33 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-26 22:00 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2008-12-27 3:06 ` Theodore Tso
2008-12-27 9:19 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2009-01-02 3:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-02 8:29 ` Andreas Sundstrom
2009-01-02 14:10 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-03 10:25 ` Andreas Sundstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495526F6.9040704@zappa.cx \
--to=sunkan@zappa.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox